Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 08:56:59 am
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: TSSM 2010 unit 3 solutions anyone have them?  (Read 3384 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

macostar

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Respect: 0
TSSM 2010 unit 3 solutions anyone have them?
« on: May 31, 2011, 04:16:21 pm »
0
Hi guys, does anyone have the solutions to TSSM 2010 unit 3?
Logged

Vincezor

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 332
  • Respect: +11
  • School: Glen Waverley Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: TSSM 2010 unit 3 solutions anyone have them?
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2011, 04:26:01 pm »
0
See attached. Enjoy :)
« Last Edit: June 01, 2011, 04:55:16 pm by Vincezor »
Logged
2010: Systems Engineering 44            

2011: Specialist Mathematics 37 | Mathematical Methods (CAS) 43 | Physics 39 | Chemistry 42 | English 41

ATAR: 98.50

2012: Eng/Law @ Monash

macostar

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Respect: 0
Re: TSSM 2010 unit 3 solutions anyone have them?
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2011, 09:39:46 pm »
0
Thanks Vince.
Logged

yawho

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 213
  • Respect: +2
Re: TSSM 2010 unit 3 solutions anyone have them?
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2011, 09:48:34 pm »
0
2010 tssm u3 questions?
Logged

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: TSSM 2010 unit 3 solutions anyone have them?
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2011, 10:02:36 pm »
0
TSSM is so dodgy, so many mistakes every year... Found one this morning in a banked slope question...  :knuppel2:
Logged

cranberry

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 310
  • Respect: +5
Re: TSSM 2010 unit 3 solutions anyone have them?
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2011, 10:17:00 pm »
0
can anyone, whose done tssm 2010, confirm q 14 (motion)....the ball goes from rest (top) to rest (bottom), shouldn't total mgh (at top) = total (elastic potential) at bottom, assuming no energy is lost?

they say total mgh (at top) = elastic potential + kinetic energy...
Logged
Master of Civil Engineering and Bachelor of Science at the University of Melbourne

VCE:
2010: Revolutions [36]
2011: English 45, Legal Studies 38, Physics 37, Chemistry 34, Methods 36

94.85

Vincezor

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 332
  • Respect: +11
  • School: Glen Waverley Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: TSSM 2010 unit 3 solutions anyone have them?
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2011, 10:24:33 pm »
0
Quote from: Rohitpi on May 31, 2011, 10:02:36 pm
TSSM is so dodgy, so many mistakes every year... Found one this morning in a banked slope question...  :knuppel2:

Was this TSSM 2009 by any chance? If so, I got v = 37 m/s or something along those lines but definitely not what they put as the answer.

They did



and not


Logged
2010: Systems Engineering 44            

2011: Specialist Mathematics 37 | Mathematical Methods (CAS) 43 | Physics 39 | Chemistry 42 | English 41

ATAR: 98.50

2012: Eng/Law @ Monash

Millar.bj

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Respect: 0
Re: TSSM 2010 unit 3 solutions anyone have them?
« Reply #7 on: June 01, 2011, 11:12:35 am »
0
Anyone have the questions?
« Last Edit: June 01, 2011, 11:17:46 am by Millar.bj »
Logged

Vincezor

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 332
  • Respect: +11
  • School: Glen Waverley Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: TSSM 2010 unit 3 solutions anyone have them?
« Reply #8 on: June 01, 2011, 04:55:57 pm »
0
See above, I edited my original post and attached the Exam and Solutions.
Logged
2010: Systems Engineering 44            

2011: Specialist Mathematics 37 | Mathematical Methods (CAS) 43 | Physics 39 | Chemistry 42 | English 41

ATAR: 98.50

2012: Eng/Law @ Monash

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: TSSM 2010 unit 3 solutions anyone have them?
« Reply #9 on: June 01, 2011, 07:35:06 pm »
0
Quote from: Vincezor on May 31, 2011, 10:24:33 pm
Quote from: Rohitpi on May 31, 2011, 10:02:36 pm
TSSM is so dodgy, so many mistakes every year... Found one this morning in a banked slope question...  :knuppel2:

Was this TSSM 2009 by any chance? If so, I got v = 37 m/s or something along those lines but definitely not what they put as the answer.

They did



and not




Yep, the same one. Pretty lolz how they got it wrong :)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up