Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 21, 2025, 08:16:36 pm

Author Topic: Bawse's SM Question Thread  (Read 2606 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bawse

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • I can't believe I ate the whole thing
  • Respect: +4
Re: Bawse's SM Question Thread
« Reply #15 on: March 27, 2011, 11:53:03 am »
0
8, 165 deg; 8, -75 deg

Do you mind showing me how you got that?

Thank you
Biology, Chemistry, English, Methods, Specialist

Aim: 80+

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Bawse's SM Question Thread
« Reply #16 on: March 27, 2011, 11:58:08 am »
0
If it is a cubic equation, then an Argand diagram will have 3 lines that kinda look like a hippy sign - lines with equal angles in between.

Therefore:
45,
45 + 120,
45 - 120
= 45, 165, - 75

The magnitude always stays the same, hence enppassant's solutions...
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: Bawse's SM Question Thread
« Reply #17 on: March 27, 2011, 12:17:10 pm »
0
Of course that is assuming that by "cubic equation" we mean an equation of the form . If it was just a general degree 3 polynomial then we cannot say that the angle between them is equal, or that they even have the same modulus.
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

bawse

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • I can't believe I ate the whole thing
  • Respect: +4
Re: Bawse's SM Question Thread
« Reply #18 on: March 27, 2011, 12:20:20 pm »
0
Thanks luken.
Biology, Chemistry, English, Methods, Specialist

Aim: 80+

bawse

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • I can't believe I ate the whole thing
  • Respect: +4
Re: Bawse's SM Question Thread
« Reply #19 on: March 27, 2011, 09:35:17 pm »
0
Have I done this correctly?

Quote
Jeff and Henry are picturing their position as if theu were on an Argand diagram. Jeff's standing at point G on level ground 8 units from the origin on a 45 degree angle. Henry is at point F on level ground with the coordinates

Let c represent point G and d represent point H









« Last Edit: March 27, 2011, 09:44:58 pm by bawse »
Biology, Chemistry, English, Methods, Specialist

Aim: 80+

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Bawse's SM Question Thread
« Reply #20 on: March 27, 2011, 09:58:34 pm »
0
c is wrong...

8 units from the origin on a 45 degree angle =

For ease of division, you can also convert d into polar form:




Hence,







You can then get the co-ords from here:














Hence co-ords are:

« Last Edit: March 27, 2011, 10:06:02 pm by luken93 »
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

bawse

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • I can't believe I ate the whole thing
  • Respect: +4
Re: Bawse's SM Question Thread
« Reply #21 on: March 27, 2011, 10:02:16 pm »
0
Ah ok, I totally misread it  :-[

Thanks again luken :)
Biology, Chemistry, English, Methods, Specialist

Aim: 80+

bawse

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • I can't believe I ate the whole thing
  • Respect: +4
Re: Bawse's SM Question Thread
« Reply #22 on: June 11, 2011, 10:50:54 pm »
0
and , then

Anyone mind helping? Thanks.
Biology, Chemistry, English, Methods, Specialist

Aim: 80+

xZero

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 898
  • Respect: +68
Re: Bawse's SM Question Thread
« Reply #23 on: June 11, 2011, 11:16:05 pm »
0
use substitution, let u=x^2. see if you can work it out from there
2009: Chinese SLA
2010: English, Maths method[45,A+ A+ A+], Specialist maths[44,A+,A,A+], Physics[40,A,A+,A+], Psychology Atar:94.75
2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering/Science @ Monash

Methods/Spesh/Physics tuition

bawse

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • I can't believe I ate the whole thing
  • Respect: +4
Re: Bawse's SM Question Thread
« Reply #24 on: June 11, 2011, 11:45:37 pm »
0
Lol, I'm an idiot. I just realised it's








integral of is



« Last Edit: June 12, 2011, 12:53:33 am by bawse »
Biology, Chemistry, English, Methods, Specialist

Aim: 80+

xZero

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 898
  • Respect: +68
Re: Bawse's SM Question Thread
« Reply #25 on: June 12, 2011, 12:44:09 am »
0
or you can let u=x^2+1 ahahha, nice work!

might wanna fix your latex tho, the integral isn't displaying properly
2009: Chinese SLA
2010: English, Maths method[45,A+ A+ A+], Specialist maths[44,A+,A,A+], Physics[40,A,A+,A+], Psychology Atar:94.75
2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering/Science @ Monash

Methods/Spesh/Physics tuition

bawse

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 77
  • I can't believe I ate the whole thing
  • Respect: +4
Re: Bawse's SM Question Thread
« Reply #26 on: June 12, 2011, 12:54:08 am »
0
Lol, thanks.

I fixed the latex, was using the incorrect command.
Biology, Chemistry, English, Methods, Specialist

Aim: 80+