Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 11:29:34 am

Author Topic: Level of tomorrow's exam  (Read 3456 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chemkid_23

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
  • Respect: +6
Level of tomorrow's exam
« on: June 14, 2011, 01:52:58 pm »
0
Do people have a vague guess on the level of tomorrow's exam
ie straight forward like the 08, or a bit harder like the 09?
Doing the 2010 soon

homosapiens

  • Guest
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2011, 02:04:20 pm »
0
The standard will probably be between the '09 and '10 one. It will definitely be more reasonable than the '09 one though, VCAA definitely learnt from their mistakes there... too many one mark questions and wayy too long a paper.

you0006

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 101
  • Respect: 0
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2011, 02:05:36 pm »
0
I reckon it'll be harder because there's less SA questions

vea

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1099
  • Respect: +29
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2011, 02:08:11 pm »
0
how many short answer Qs are there in tomorrow's exam again?
2011: ATAR 99.50
2012: Bachelor of Biomedicine, UoM
2015: Doctor of Dental Surgery, UoM

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2011, 02:09:48 pm »
0
Yeah, 8 Qs and 52 marks. I'm thinking a lot of theory questions, unfortunately :(

2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

lukew

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 50
  • Respect: 0
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2011, 02:10:49 pm »
0
I hope it'll be okay. Physics and bio ppl cam eout from my school angry and stressed cause it was so hard. :S Now we're all afraid of chem's paper....

Sakigami

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 48
  • Inconsistently consistent.
  • Respect: +1
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2011, 02:21:49 pm »
0
My guess it will be between 2009 and 2010 difficulty. 52 marks for 8 questions suggests there's going to a fair amount of those "theory" questions tagged onto every question! D:

chemkid_23

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
  • Respect: +6
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2011, 02:29:46 pm »
0
ah that sounds alright
hopefully not too long, but I rather fancy more theory than working out, especially those long stoich questions where they just give so much info and values, that they're just there to annoy you and aren't even needed
which is why im going to start on SA before MC

LachieEvans

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Respect: 0
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2011, 02:43:41 pm »
0
Yeh the AR from 2010 said that descriptions of theory and different techniques were badly done so thats what Im expecting.. .
2010: Biology [46]
2011: Methods (CAS), English, Japanese SL, Chemistry and Enhancement MediaCom.

UMAT: 99 - [81] [72] [65]

azure

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 216
  • Respect: 0
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2011, 02:48:58 pm »
0
Considering the level of the other exams.... prepare for the worst.... I have a bad feeling about it. Shorter than '09 but will be much more challenging and less straightforward I think....
2010: Chinese SL
2011: English, Japanese SL, Chemistry, Methods, Economics

97.70

Bozo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 392
  • Respect: +3
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2011, 02:53:47 pm »
0
The physics exam was way harder than all the previous years. I'm expecting the worst for chem aswell.

nemolala

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
  • Respect: +27
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #11 on: June 14, 2011, 03:01:21 pm »
0
I hope it'll be okay. Physics and bio ppl cam eout from my school angry and stressed cause it was so hard. :S Now we're all afraid of chem's paper....

omg i was thinking the same and wondering is this like a trend or something that this years mid years will be hard.

examsman

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Respect: -1
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #12 on: June 14, 2011, 03:06:53 pm »
0
Physics wasn't that much more difficult, made some really really dumb mistakes though, goodbye 50 :'(

Keo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
  • Respect: +1
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #13 on: June 14, 2011, 03:12:58 pm »
0
This year chem's exam will probably be mild-hard somewhere between 2009's paper and 2010's paper imo :P
2010: Health Human Development, Cisco
2011: English, Math methods, Chemistry, Further maths, Biology

ENTER Aim: 90+


[img width=57 height=10]http://tickers.TickerFactory.com/ezt/d/4;29;133/st/20111114/e/until+non-stop+partying/dt/14/k/ee34/event.png[/img]

banditkeith

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 136
  • Respect: +17
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Level of tomorrow's exam
« Reply #14 on: June 14, 2011, 03:16:38 pm »
0
ah that sounds alright
hopefully not too long, but I rather fancy more theory than working out, especially those long stoich questions where they just give so much info and values, that they're just there to annoy you and aren't even needed
which is why im going to start on SA before MC

Agreed. So much.
At least theory isn't so confusing. I used to prefer calculations but once I started doing more of those questions, I wanted to cry. Theory is relatively straightforward.
Plan to do all questions that are not calculations first then move on to the simple calculations leaving the complicated ones last.

I'm looking past mistakes now and doing the 2010 exam again later just to make sure I got my knowledge where it's supposed to be.