VCE Stuff > VCE Legal Studies
2007 EXAM - Your Thoughts
Jadelz:
--- Quote from: "costargh" ---5 pages for precedent!!!
holy shit
lol
I would have struggled with 1 and a half! how can u write so much on it?
--- End quote ---
I just went through the operation of precent, how its formed and where its found (you know all the stare decisi, ratio decidendi, obiter dictum stuff). Why it exists. Difference between binding and persausive. Then reversing, overruling, distinguishing and disaproving and how that a agrees or does not agree with the quote they gave us. they taked about how it was both flexible and rigid and what the effect of that was...meh i just managed to bullshit on a fair bit :D
costargh:
Fair enough
lol
yeh i wooda felt really all over the place with a question like that
I like structure in my answers. Hope u did well on it =) u think most ppl did the jury question?
Jadelz:
I hope I did too because I know a couple of screw ups I made, like about hearing the case in another court...I said it was a summary offence so Bruce couldn't. Meh. Is anyone acctually sure if breaking and entering is a summary of indictable offence?
costargh:
I am pretty sure that it can be heard on indictment.
It just didnt make sense for the question to be No that is incorrect.
Jadelz:
Well the second part was definatly not correct. True it dosent make sense, I wasn't really thinking but I still mentioned that even if he could have his case heard in another court it wouldn't be advisable because of severity of sentance and cost etc. So hopefully I'll get two marks out of 3 for that question.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version