Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 08, 2025, 07:54:16 am

Author Topic: nitpicky question that's been bugging me for ages  (Read 2777 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ninwa

  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8267
  • Respect: +1021
nitpicky question that's been bugging me for ages
« on: November 14, 2007, 06:19:57 pm »
0
How do you write electron configurations?

1s22s22p6 etc

or

1s22s2p6

Spot the difference .....
ExamPro enquiries to [email protected]

sabrina

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Respect: +1
nitpicky question that's been bugging me for ages
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2007, 06:24:02 pm »
0
i'm under the impression that both formats are accepted. confirmation anyone   :?

getting dizzy just looking at them lol

melanie.dee

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Respect: +1
nitpicky question that's been bugging me for ages
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2007, 06:24:56 pm »
0
that took me awhile to work it out haha.

i do it the first way. but i duno if thats actually right?

Ahmad

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • *dreamy sigh*
  • Respect: +15
nitpicky question that's been bugging me for ages
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2007, 06:25:29 pm »
0
I do it the first way too.
Mandark: Please, oh please, set me up on a date with that golden-haired angel who graces our undeserving school with her infinite beauty!

The collage of ideas. The music of reason. The poetry of thought. The canvas of logic.


Ninox

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 167
  • vive le science!
  • Respect: +1
Re: nitpicky question that's been bugging me for ages
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2007, 06:25:35 pm »
0
We were taught to do:
(shell number)(subshell type)(*superscript* no. of electrons in the subshell)
So something like:
   2    2    2
1s  2s   3s et cetera
Hope that shows up ok
2006: Engineering Studies 45 (Premier's Award), Religion and Societies 39
2007: Methods 45, Spesh 46, Chem 50, Physics 41, Literature 39, MUEP Maths 5.5
ENTER: 99.60
Science/Engineering @ Monash; Mat'ls Eng; Chem, Physiology?

ninwa

  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8267
  • Respect: +1021
nitpicky question that's been bugging me for ages
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2007, 06:26:20 pm »
0
VCAA seem to have it the other way in their answers.

Ah well .... it would have to be a ridiculously simple exam for them to consider taking marks away for this :P
ExamPro enquiries to [email protected]

Ninox

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 167
  • vive le science!
  • Respect: +1
Re: nitpicky question that's been bugging me for ages
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2007, 06:26:33 pm »
0
Quote from: "Ninox"
We were taught to do:
(shell number)(subshell type)(*superscript* no. of electrons in the subshell)
So something like:
   2    2    2
1s  2s   3s et cetera
Hope that shows up ok


Ok it didn't, but what I typed in words should be fine
2006: Engineering Studies 45 (Premier's Award), Religion and Societies 39
2007: Methods 45, Spesh 46, Chem 50, Physics 41, Literature 39, MUEP Maths 5.5
ENTER: 99.60
Science/Engineering @ Monash; Mat'ls Eng; Chem, Physiology?

Collin Li

  • VCE Tutor
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4957
  • Respect: +17
nitpicky question that's been bugging me for ages
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2007, 06:27:12 pm »
0
I would do the first way, you can't be marked wrong that way.

However, the numbers should be in superscript, not subscript.

ninwa

  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8267
  • Respect: +1021
nitpicky question that's been bugging me for ages
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2007, 06:28:46 pm »
0
Lol yeah I know, but I don't know how to make them superscript :oops: I fail at technology-related things.
ExamPro enquiries to [email protected]