Uni Stuff > Arts
Is anybody turned off by the Melbourne Model?
Noblesse:
I'm fairly sure the Melbourne Model saved us from the global financial crisis.
AzureBlue:
--- Quote from: SmRandmAzn on August 16, 2010, 01:55:10 pm ---lol UoM marketing is indeed powerful.
Yeah I've been sucked in too fml.
--- End quote ---
Definitely. And the lecturers and tutors are so good. But I think that the Melbourne Model actually kind of suits me, because I have many areas of interest - including actuarial, law, economics and maths and I could study subjects from all these areas (focusing on actuarial and law though).
Russ:
Breadth subjects won't really give you a depth of information in multiple areas. I've heard the same speech about it half a dozen times now and the tagline is "know something about everything [breadth] and everything about something [major]". Especially if you're aiming to major in actuarial, where you won't even get the opportunity to do six breadth.
And of course the melbourne model saved us from the GFC, it's injecting hundreds of thousands of dollars into the economy by extending course length!
AzureBlue:
Well you still get a few economics, accounting and statistical/financial maths subjects along with the actuarial subjects...
TyErd:
they scrapped bachelor of engineering coz of the melbourne model which i dont like, now I have to get a 90+ to get into bachelor of science just so i can do engineering which sucks balls coz bachelor of engineering last year was like 85. So im off to rmit.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version