Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

February 22, 2026, 02:09:34 am

Author Topic: The Catcher in the Rye  (Read 2770 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

methodsboy

  • Guest
The Catcher in the Rye
« on: November 29, 2008, 05:31:14 pm »
0
hey guys
i've just read up to chp 9 of The Catcher in the Rye and i was wondering if there is an actual movie version available.

bucket

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1005
  • Respect: +8
Re: The Catcher in the Rye
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2008, 05:42:39 pm »
0
no, thank god.

rebel without a cause has similar themes.
Monash University
Science/Engineering (Maths, Physics and Electrical Engineering)

methodsboy

  • Guest
Re: The Catcher in the Rye
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2008, 05:53:11 pm »
0
i wish there was, it would have been good to get a visual
A man for all seasons looks boring and complex

RD

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Respect: +2
Re: The Catcher in the Rye
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2008, 05:54:35 pm »
0
no, thank god.
Catcher in the rye was awesome!! I really liked the book.

kurrymuncher

  • Guest
Re: The Catcher in the Rye
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2008, 05:58:59 pm »
0
from wikipedia:

Attempted film adaptations
Early in his career, J. D. Salinger expressed a willingness to have his work adapted for the screen.[34] However, in 1949, a critically panned film version of his short story "Uncle Wiggily in Connecticut" was released; renamed My Foolish Heart and taking great liberties with Salinger's story, the film is widely considered to be among the reasons that Salinger has refused to allow any subsequent movie adaptations of his work.[35] The enduring popularity of The Catcher in the Rye, however, has resulted in repeated attempts to secure the novel's screen rights.

When The Catcher in the Rye was first released, many offers were made to adapt it for the screen; among them was Sam Goldwyn, producer of My Foolish Heart.[35] In a letter written in the early fifties, Salinger spoke of mounting a play in which he would play the role of Holden Caulfield opposite Margaret O'Brien, and, if he couldn’t play the part himself, to “forget about it." Almost fifty years later, the writer Joyce Maynard definitively concluded, "The only person who might ever have played Holden Caulfield would have been J. D. Salinger."[36]

Salinger told Maynard in the seventies that Jerry Lewis "tried for years to get his hands on the part of Holden,"[36] despite Lewis not having read the novel until he was in his thirties.[30] Celebrities ranging from Marlon Brando and Jack Nicholson to Tobey Maguire and Leonardo DiCaprio have since made efforts to make a film adaptation.[37] In an interview with Premiere magazine, John Cusack commented that his one regret about turning twenty-one was that he had become too old to play Holden Caulfield. Writer-director Billy Wilder recounted his abortive attempts to snare the novel's rights, saying,

“ Of course I read The Catcher in the Rye....Wonderful book. I loved it. I pursued it. I wanted to make a picture out of it. And then one day a young man came to the office of Leland Hayward, my agent, in New York, and said, 'Please tell Mr. Leland Hayward to lay off. He’s very, very insensitive.' And he walked out. That was the entire speech. I never saw him. That was J. D. Salinger and that was Catcher in the Rye.[38] ”

In 1961, Salinger denied Elia Kazan permission to direct a stage adaptation of Catcher for Broadway.[39] More recently, Salinger's agents received bids for the Catcher movie rights from Harvey Weinstein and Steven Spielberg,[40] neither of which was even passed on to Salinger for consideration.

In the 1993 movie Six Degrees of Separation [41] Paul ( Will Smith) interpreted a modern Holden Caufield. Paul reads a line underlined in a copy of Catcher in the Rye: "My brother's in Hollywood being a prostitute."[42] "What a phony slob ...(his father) was."[43] "People never notice anything." [44] "'Like hell it' I took it off and looked at it. I sort of closed one eye, like to take aim at it. 'This is a people shooting hat,'...'I shoot people in this hat.'"[45]. And Paul goes on from there to talk about "the death of the imagination."[46]

In 2003, the BBC television program The Big Read featured The Catcher in the Rye, intercutting discussions of the novel with "a series of short films that featured an actor playing Salinger's adolescent antihero, Holden Caulfield."[39] The show defended its unlicensed adaptation of the novel by claiming to be a "literary review," and no major charges were filed.

According to a speculative article in The Guardian in May 2006, there are rumors that director Terrence Malick has been linked to a possible screen adaptation of the novel.[47]




The book was awesome, hopefully there will be a movie soon. JD salinger hates movies, so there probably wont be a movie while he still alive.
« Last Edit: November 29, 2008, 06:05:07 pm by kurrymuncher »

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: The Catcher in the Rye
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2008, 06:24:58 pm »
0
Catcher in the Rye is actually extremely readable, so maybe you should try reading the book. Crazy I know.
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.

methodsboy

  • Guest
Re: The Catcher in the Rye
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2008, 08:07:50 pm »
0
well i DO understand the book
and i enjoy it also
but it would be a bonus if we had some sort of visual to complement the book

delta_rox

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Respect: 0
Re: The Catcher in the Rye
« Reply #7 on: November 29, 2008, 10:54:35 pm »
0
I just finished reading Catcher today, found it really enjoyable. Will most likely read it again over the Summer holidays, ensuring I know it inside out before I go back next year. I love the context, 'Identity and Belonging'!
'08 -
Legal Studies

'09 -
English
English Language
History: Revolutions
Psychology
Health and Human Development

costargh

  • Guest
Re: The Catcher in the Rye
« Reply #8 on: November 29, 2008, 11:54:24 pm »
0
No way. AMFAS is wayy better than Catcher in the Rye.
Read AMFAS at least 3 times and then ull be engaged with its intriguing themes and historical context.

methodsboy

  • Guest
Re: The Catcher in the Rye
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2008, 01:55:08 pm »
0
AMFAS looks so boring

costargh

  • Guest
Re: The Catcher in the Rye
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2008, 06:10:46 pm »
0
key word: looks

vcestar

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 284
  • Respect: +1
Re: The Catcher in the Rye
« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2008, 06:15:48 pm »
0
well i DO understand the book
and i enjoy it also
but it would be a bonus if we had some sort of visual to complement the book

One of the reasons a movie wasnt made was because most of the conflict happens internally within holden.

For context you need to use this internal conflict to relate to your context of identity and belonging, if thats what you are doing. Right? You just need to pick up on ideas. In your essay, you dont have to relate so explicitly to the text, so you know you dont need to know every scene in detail. Even then, the book can achieve this without watching a movie.