Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 22, 2025, 06:44:49 am

Author Topic: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18  (Read 6774 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hielly

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 530
  • Respect: +5
the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« on: January 15, 2009, 01:58:17 pm »
0
hey,
Anyone have any opinion on this issue?

clinton_09

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 959
  • Respect: +1
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2009, 02:20:22 pm »
0
do you mean learners?

Hielly

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 530
  • Respect: +5
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2009, 02:22:44 pm »
0
yep learners when they start to learn how to drive.

Eriny

  • The lamp of enlightenment
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • *******
  • Posts: 2954
  • Respect: +100
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2009, 02:46:51 pm »
0
The road toll is the highest in Victoria, but we have the highest driving age. I'm not sure if it will really help anything.

Also, it would be a huge inconvenience to not be able to drive on a full license by the time you are an adult.

hard

  • Guest
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2009, 03:21:31 pm »
0
mmm no.

costargh

  • Guest
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2009, 03:24:57 pm »
0
The passenger restrictions are an arse already so no thanks.

Having passengers ducking down in the back seats is annoying (for them at least haha)

Matt The Rat

  • Guest
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2009, 04:23:56 pm »
0
The passenger restrictions are an arse already so no thanks.

Having passengers ducking down in the back seats is annoying (for them at least haha)

And a kick in the pants if/when you get caught and cop the demerit points and fine.

costargh

  • Guest
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2009, 04:55:30 pm »
0
I live dangerously....
nah i've only really had more than one passenger on one or two occasions.

and that was because they were both intoxicated and it was safer for me 2 drive them home.

iamdan08

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 697
  • VCE Survivor
  • Respect: +7
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #8 on: January 15, 2009, 05:00:04 pm »
0
I live dangerously....
nah i've only really had more than one passenger on one or two occasions.

and that was because they were both intoxicated and it was safer for me 2 drive them home.

Apparently in extreme cases such as those, the police waver the passenger restrictions, since it would have been more dangerous for you not to drive them. You could argue that if you didn't drive them, they would have to drive intoxicated or leave them to find their own way home under the influence.
2007-08 VCE - Accounting, Texts & Traditions, Methods, Chem, Physics, Lit
         
2011 Bachelor of Biomedicine (Completed) @ The University of Melbourne
2012 Doctor of Medicine (Second Year) @ The University of Melbourne

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #9 on: January 15, 2009, 06:21:24 pm »
0
I live dangerously....
nah i've only really had more than one passenger on one or two occasions.

and that was because they were both intoxicated and it was safer for me 2 drive them home.

Apparently in extreme cases such as those, the police waver the passenger restrictions, since it would have been more dangerous for you not to drive them. You could argue that if you didn't drive them, they would have to drive intoxicated or leave them to find their own way home under the influence.

I think the point of that new law was to avoid situations such as that one. In any case, I don't think that is the case where they would choose to waver that law, since an argument could be made that you could have hired a taxi, called their parents etc... instead. There's a set criteria on when the laws are wavered, the one that I can remember is being work-related or having a full licensed driver on board.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2009, 06:24:33 pm by Glockmeister »
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.

costargh

  • Guest
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2009, 10:27:55 pm »
0
Nah actually iamdan08 is 100% right. I've heard of heaps of people getting wavers when their excuses seem reasonable and they seem to be doing the right thing. One of my mates told me it happened to him twice.
The cops seem to be pretty understanding if you have a good enough reason.

ReVeL

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 972
  • Respect: +3
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2009, 11:13:10 pm »
0
Definately not. Nuff said.
||  2008 VCE Graduate  ||  BCom @ UoM [Accounting & Finance Majors] - Completing 3rd year  ||

kuya17

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 47
  • Fear is a reflex. Courage is a choice.
  • Respect: +1
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2009, 07:27:25 pm »
0
I believe that notion to be insane. At current the new driving laws are ridiculous. They are just the end product of the governments quick fix attitudes. The only reason I have to log 120 hours and do an extra year on P's is because the government is too stupid to realize that its not the experience and amount of hours driving that get people killed, but rather their stupidity and "it wont happen to me" attitude. I feel that the current system is completely worthless, because after logging 120 hours, I personally am most likely still going to rip the occasional drift, even though I fully aware of the risks.

A better solution than increasing the amount of time you have to have a square plate on your car, would be make a compulsory day, in which new drivers get to meet victims of stupidity in cars in person, and have to listen to how it affected them or maybe see the end result of a crash caused by stupidity. Another solution could be run people through a extremely graphical video of car crash scenes, similar to some of America's driving offense programs.
"Only by going too far can one possibly find out how far they can go."

"Don't follow where the path may lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."

"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen."

kurrymuncher

  • Guest
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2009, 10:42:11 pm »
0
grrrrrr, i hate the logbook. I've had my license for over a year and have only clocked about 8 hours haha. If I was born 1 or 2 months earlier then I wouldnt have to fill in that stupid thing.

kuya17

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 47
  • Fear is a reflex. Courage is a choice.
  • Respect: +1
Re: the driving age should be raised to the age of 18
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2009, 10:48:29 pm »
0
I was stupid, I was like, the log book wont be that bad,  *waits two months to get license* GG. MISTAKE
"Only by going too far can one possibly find out how far they can go."

"Don't follow where the path may lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."

"Some people want it to happen, some wish it would happen, others make it happen."