Administration > General Site Discussion
AQ banned?
osmoister:
--- Quote from: Mao on January 12, 2009, 11:53:37 am ---AQ had several previous accounts, some of which were deleted after highly racist and derogatory comments.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: Mao on January 12, 2009, 11:53:37 am ---The bigotry he showed, especially to enwiabe, I do think he was very lucky not to be banned, and not be banned permanently.
--- End quote ---
can i please be shown an example? i can't seem to find these threads you speak of.
danieltennis:
--- Quote from: AQ on January 09, 2009, 04:28:16 am ---I HATE FEDERER. !!!!!
--- End quote ---
I find this highly offensive and provocative.
costargh:
--- Quote from: daniel. on January 12, 2009, 07:43:50 pm ---
--- Quote from: AQ on January 09, 2009, 04:28:16 am ---I HATE FEDERER. !!!!!
--- End quote ---
I find this highly offensive and provocative.
--- End quote ---
i agree
Was lucky not to have been permabanned after that stunt!!!
Case closed
excal:
--- Quote from: osmoister on January 12, 2009, 07:25:55 pm ---
--- Quote from: Mao on January 12, 2009, 11:53:37 am ---AQ had several previous accounts, some of which were deleted after highly racist and derogatory comments.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: Mao on January 12, 2009, 11:53:37 am ---The bigotry he showed, especially to enwiabe, I do think he was very lucky not to be banned, and not be banned permanently.
--- End quote ---
can i please be shown an example? i can't seem to find these threads you speak of.
--- End quote ---
Put it this way, we have new information that may cause us to reconsider his ban in extending it by a significant length, if not permanently. Once we finish our investigation, we will happily be open with what we've found. I'm perfectly happy, as are the moderation team, with being completely transparent with our reasoning behind bans on request if it does not create extant ethical dilemmas (such as breaches of privacy et cetera).
As for the two week ban, posts like this contributed:
http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,9475.msg121129.html#msg121129
and his "contributions" to this thread: http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,9271.msg119085.html#msg119085
Mao:
osmoister: you are being stupid. the ban list is 4 pages long, not every ban is publicly announced. AQ was not banned for a particular post, he was banned for his consistent trolling behaviour, and past trolling on other accounts which has been brought to light recently.
BTW this thread really isn't necessary.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version