Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 11:27:32 am

Author Topic: TrueTears question thread  (Read 33950 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

monokekie

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #180 on: June 06, 2009, 01:05:25 am »
0
umm. with regards to that DNA question, i got 28..

i assumed its double stranded since a gene would be in a helix shape. then there would be 15 neucleotides in each strand being linked by 14 bonds that could be hydrolysised. 14x2=28 then 28 molecules of water would be required.

this is my own interpretation of this question though.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #181 on: June 06, 2009, 01:13:11 am »
0
umm. with regards to that DNA question, i got 28..

i assumed its double stranded since a gene would be in a helix shape. then there would be 15 neucleotides in each strand being linked by 14 bonds that could be hydrolysised. 14x2=28 then 28 molecules of water would be required.

this is my own interpretation of this question though.
Yeah it says COMPLETELY seperate the nucleotide itself.

So I did what you did, I thought it was double stranded so you will need 28 water molecules to seperate each nucleotide from the other nucleotides.

But then you need 2 water molecules to break the bond b/w phospate and deoxyribose and deoxyribose + base.

So theres 30 nucleotides, 2 x 30 = 60

so should be 60 + 28 = 88 water molecules.

But the answers have 89, which I assume they thought it was single stranded hence you need 29 water molecules to seperate all the nucleotides from each other.

How should I interpret this question?
« Last Edit: June 06, 2009, 01:15:58 am by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

monokekie

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #182 on: June 06, 2009, 01:21:42 am »
0
arhh.. !

its single stranded..

there are 30 neucleotides altogether,

then: there are 30 bonds between nitrogenbase and deoxyribose sugar
        and 30 bonds between sugar and phosphate groups (one for each neucleotide)
        and 29 bonds between the 30 neucleotides

i hope this makes sense   :)

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #183 on: June 06, 2009, 01:24:27 am »
0
arhh.. !

its single stranded..

there are 30 neucleotides altogether,

then: there are 30 bonds between nitrogenbase and deoxyribose sugar
        and 30 bonds between sugar and phosphate groups (one for each neucleotide)
        and 29 bonds between the 30 neucleotides

i hope this makes sense   :)
Yeap I know that, but how do you know if it is single / double stranded? That's what seems ambiguous to me. :P
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

monokekie

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #184 on: June 06, 2009, 01:27:43 am »
0
hmmmm....... yeah.....  :-\

where does this question come from??


TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #185 on: June 06, 2009, 01:29:02 am »
0
hmmmm....... yeah.....  :-\

where does this question come from??


TSFX 09 paper. Q 6a) ii
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

monokekie

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #186 on: June 06, 2009, 01:34:56 am »
0
ohh.. no wonder... tsfx >_<!

Irena seems really hot on ambiguous questions...  

anyway.. hopefully i can figure it out tnite, in my dreams LoL
« Last Edit: June 06, 2009, 01:36:45 am by monokekie »

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #187 on: June 06, 2009, 01:37:50 am »
0
It's not so ambiguous if you google'd what 'gene' means.

A gene is a sub-unit of DNA, and it is double stranded :)
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #188 on: June 06, 2009, 01:38:23 am »
0
It's not so ambiguous if you google'd what 'gene' means.

A gene is a sub-unit of DNA, and it is double stranded :)
So answer should be 88 instead of 89? :P
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

arthurk

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 405
  • Respect: +3
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #189 on: June 06, 2009, 01:59:48 am »
0
lol mao had same idea as me
google has all the answers:P
bit late isnt it truetears
2 am?

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #190 on: June 06, 2009, 02:16:30 am »
0
Wait, ignore previous. I think a gene is single stranded now.

=\ It's very ambiguous :P (I'm such a hypocrite)
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

monokekie

  • Guest
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #191 on: June 06, 2009, 11:49:05 am »
0
rofl.

i wish this type of questions will to appear too often on exams...

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #192 on: June 06, 2009, 12:52:37 pm »
0
Alright thank you all!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

shinny

  • VN MVP 2010
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4327
  • Respect: +256
  • School: Melbourne High School
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #193 on: June 06, 2009, 03:33:31 pm »
0
From my experience, take base and base pairs to mean the same thing in terms of length of DNA. I don't see why anyone would want to talk in terms of both strands added together, that's just stupid. As for Mao's dilemma, it's probably more correct to say it's single stranded since only one side is actually transcribed and is the 'actual' gene.
MBBS (hons) - Monash University

YR11 '07: Biology 49
YR12 '08: Chemistry 47; Spesh 41; Methods 49; Business Management 50; English 43

ENTER: 99.70


NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: TrueTears question thread
« Reply #194 on: June 06, 2009, 04:14:49 pm »
0
I think my bio teacher last year said something about us calling the DNA on the coding strand (non-template strand) the gene so yeah that should be right.

Quote from: shinny
As for Mao's dilemma, it's probably more correct to say it's single stranded since only one side is actually transcribed and is the 'actual' gene.

Although a point of conflict here: according to my teacher it was the side that wasn't transcribed that is the 'actual' gene because this strand is complementary to the other strand just like the mRNA and the mRNA contains the codons and the codons make the gene.

Back to the question I can't imagine them meaning 30 bases in a gene to mean 15 bases on two strands. If they said there are a total of 30 bases on a double stranded piece of DNA then it is different. But still the question is ambiguous.
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics