Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 30, 2024, 03:19:31 am

Author Topic: 4U Maths Question Thread  (Read 665491 times)  Share 

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1635 on: January 04, 2018, 06:09:29 pm »
+5
Use De Moivre’s theorem to express cos5theta and sin5theta in powers of costheta and sintheta. Hence, express tan5theta as a rational function of t where t=tantheta and deduce that tan(Pi/5)tan(2pi/5)tan(3pi/5)tan(4pi/5)=5.

I’ve gotten up to having
Tan5theta= (t5-10t3+5t)/(5t4-10t2+1)
But I don’t really know how I’m supposed to use that to deduce the last line in the question. Any help would be appreciated, thanks.

The expression is basically your numerator from the previous part.

Note that this is safe, because we haven't divided by 0 at the "important" points. This is as a consequence of the fact that the numerator and denominator have no common factors.





RustyWasTaken

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1636 on: January 05, 2018, 08:13:04 pm »
0
b) How do I identify which roots belong to z^6 + z^3 + 1 = 0
Cheers :D
why study for english when you can waste all your time on ext 2 and still underperform.
gvng gvng

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1637 on: January 05, 2018, 10:37:34 pm »
+4
b) How do I identify which roots belong to z^6 + z^3 + 1 = 0
Cheers :D


These should be \(\text{ cis }\frac{2\pi}{9},\text{ cis }\frac{4\pi}{9},\text{ cis }\frac{8\pi}{9},\text{ cis }\frac{10\pi}{9},\text{ cis }\frac{14\pi}{9},\text{ cis }\frac{16\pi}{9} \)
« Last Edit: January 05, 2018, 10:47:32 pm by RuiAce »

maria.micale

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1638 on: January 06, 2018, 11:38:56 am »
0
So that gives you the weird expression involving \(C-k\) and according to your answers we can stop there. Which is reasonable, because we now have something that links \(m\) and \(k\) together.

The second point is actually the fixed point. If you let the first, second and third points have \(x\)-coordinate \(\alpha-d, \alpha, \alpha+d\), you'll see that \(\alpha = -\frac{A}{3} \)

I think I’m confused, could you please explain further because I don’t know how to get to the answer still. Thanks :)

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1639 on: January 06, 2018, 11:42:01 am »
+5



maria.micale

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1640 on: January 06, 2018, 12:19:43 pm »
0
Ok thanks heaps Rui!!!

Lefkiiii6

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1641 on: January 06, 2018, 12:23:53 pm »
0




Sorry I'm looking at this question too and I don't understand how to find that c-k = A/27 (9(B-m) - 2A^2)

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1642 on: January 06, 2018, 12:41:48 pm »
0
Sorry I'm looking at this question too and I don't understand how to find that c-k = A/27 (9(B-m) - 2A^2)
That part was addressed a few posts back when she first posted this question

Lefkiiii6

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1643 on: January 06, 2018, 01:20:45 pm »
0
That part was addressed a few posts back when she first posted this question

Yeah I read this but I am still not sure.

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1644 on: January 06, 2018, 02:17:50 pm »
0
Yeah I read this but I am still not sure.
Please elaborate further on the confusion.

(Pretty much all I did was consider what Maria had proven in part a), and demonstrated the link between that and part b). At that point, all that was left was basically just substituting a = A, b = B-m, c = C-k)
« Last Edit: January 06, 2018, 02:28:44 pm by RuiAce »

itssona

  • MOTM: APR 17
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 331
  • Respect: +10
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1645 on: January 07, 2018, 06:04:25 pm »
0
how would you go about graphing x^3 + y^3 =1
as in what process would you follow
« Last Edit: January 07, 2018, 06:08:58 pm by sssona09 »
HSC 2018 : Maths 3U, Maths 4U, English Advanced, Biology, Physics, Chemistry

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1646 on: January 07, 2018, 09:11:40 pm »
+3
how would you go about graphing x^3 + y^3 =1
as in what process would you follow


i.e. a S.P. at \( (0,1) \) and a point where the derivative is undefined at \( (1,0) \).

As opposed to the semicircle \( y=(1-x^2)^{1/2} \). Square rooting a negative number is problematic but cube rooting is not.

Think about it visually. If you graphed \(y=1\) it's just gonna be a horizontal line, because a constant doesn't change. If you graphed \(y=x^3\) however, that thing is gonna eventually blow up. Whatever blows up will have a much more significant impact on anything that does not blow up, as you let \(x\) become really really large.



RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1647 on: January 11, 2018, 02:01:46 pm »
+4
Hey Sona, I wanna come back to this one. I've found the formal way to prove where the asymptote is.
how would you go about graphing x^3 + y^3 =1
as in what process would you follow



Of course, it's also a bit advanced. But at least it's a legit proof now.
____________________________________________


____________________________________________



Note: \( \sqrt{\frac{a}{b}} = \frac{\sqrt{a}}{\sqrt{b}} \) and similarly \( \sqrt[3]{\frac{a}{b}} = \frac{\sqrt[3]{a}}{\sqrt[3]{b}}\), which has been used here. Some steps could've been skipped if you're really good at tackling algebra.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2018, 03:17:26 pm by RuiAce »

RustyWasTaken

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1648 on: January 16, 2018, 01:05:36 pm »
0
Cheers :)
why study for english when you can waste all your time on ext 2 and still underperform.
gvng gvng

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1649 on: January 16, 2018, 01:18:56 pm »
+3