It depends on what you choose to do my dude.
There are 4 AOS in global politics, each is examined thoroughly, these 4 topics are Global Actors, Power in the Asia-Pacific, Ethical issues and debates, and Global Crises.
To answer these you'll have to do things like outline, explain, evaluate, and analyse, words which seem similar but have slight nuances that affect the marks given, e.g we were taught that questions to do with 'evaluation' require you to explore both sides on an issue and compare and contrast their effectiveness to score highly, whereas a low scoring response may only look at one side, which is just something to look out for.
You really wanna get these question words under control, because if you don't know what you need to write, how can you get the marks?
For questions relating to the Asia Pacific, you need to choose one state that you will use for the entire section, and also remember that only examples in the Asia Pacific area may be used. No talking about Chinese migrant workers in Chile please, no matter how interesting.
Furthermore, where it says "use a different 'global crisis', or whatever from the last question", please do so, you will lose the marks otherwise, and have to explain to your teacher why you got an ungraded on the exam
Probably the most important point is that all examples must be post 2000. Obviously these issues such as terrorism did not all spring into existence on January 1st 2000, however the bulk of your examples must be post 2000, for example the decrease in foreign fighters joining ISIS going from 2000 a month to just 200 by the end of 2015, or the 9.5% decline in Iceland's budget deficit % of GDP from 2009 to 2014.
You can mention causes of terrorism etc, but don't make them the main part of your argument, imo the best place is to use them in your essay as it shows knowledge and understanding but doesn't undermine the points you're making as you have a long time to flesh out any other post 2000 examples in greater detail.
Obv treaties/International laws can be pre 2000, personally I did the Geneva and Genocide conventions, both of which were pre 2000.
Also keep in mind that you have an essay to write that is worth 25% of the mark, so try to leave ~40 mins to write it. Don't get yelled at by the supervisors to stop writing like I did
Tl;dr
Read the question.
Understand what the question is asking.
Choose one Asia Pacific state.
Use only examples from the Asia Pacific in questions from U3 AOS 2.
If the question tells you to do something, please do it, don't dog the boys.
Use post-2000 (Or continuing) examples or you will fail.
You can mention causes but you shouldn't dwell on them, the bulk should be post-2000 or continuing, some of which are (e.g sectarian divide in terrorism).
International treaties / laws can be pre-2000, don't write the year you don't need to.
Leave yourself time to write the essay, it's worth 25% of the exam my dude.
Sorry if this isn't what you wanted I'm tired. Ask me specific questions you have and I'll answer them