Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 29, 2024, 03:18:47 pm

Author Topic: 4U Maths Question Thread  (Read 665319 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1680 on: January 27, 2018, 10:01:41 pm »
+1
How should I do this?
Sketch the locus given and then deduce the max and min values of \( \arg(z) \). Recall that \( \arg(z) \) measures the angle made at 0+0i with respect to the positive real axis.

Note that the argument is optimised (i.e. maximised and minimised) whenever the ray drawn is tangential to the circle you sketched earlier.

clovvy

  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 294
  • Respect: +44
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1681 on: January 27, 2018, 10:04:38 pm »
0
This is a locus question, the first thing you want to do is sketch the locus.... Iz-2iI=1... in this case let z=x+iy and then square root both sides than you will notice that it is a circle with radius 1 at the centre (0,2)...... and then to find arg(z)... Rui I can't remember exactly how to do that... -_-
2018 HSC: 4U maths, 3U maths, Standard English, Chemistry, Physics

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1682 on: January 28, 2018, 07:24:31 pm »
+4
Deleted a previous reply - Now that I have more time I've decided to just do this one. Having said that though, still use the 4U trial survival handout as a reference point.

It may be worth noting that if we had \( |z-2i|\le 1 \), for this type of question we would ignore the disc's interior. This is because the minimum and maximum of both \( |z| \) and \(\arg z\) can only be attained on the disc's boundary, i.e. the actual circle. It just so happens that for the argument, we only consider when it's tangential to the circle.


Note, however, that the max can also be found from symmetry, once you know the min,


_________________________________________________



RustyWasTaken

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1683 on: January 29, 2018, 01:32:28 am »
0
Cheers
  :'(
why study for english when you can waste all your time on ext 2 and still underperform.
gvng gvng

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1684 on: January 29, 2018, 09:22:04 am »
+1

Jeeffffffffffffff

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1685 on: January 31, 2018, 01:34:45 pm »
0
Show that if x>0, y>0 then
1/x2+1/y2>=8/(x+y)2

Please help, fully worked solution would be appreciated.

maria.micale

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1686 on: January 31, 2018, 01:36:33 pm »
0
Using expansion (x+ y + z)3, show that (x + y + z)3 >= 27xyz

I've written out expansion but cannot solve question. Any help appreciated.

Opengangs

  • New South Welsh
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 718
  • \(\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{G}\)
  • Respect: +480
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1687 on: January 31, 2018, 01:48:43 pm »
+2
Show that if x>0, y>0 then
1/x2+1/y2>=8/(x+y)2

Please help, fully worked solution would be appreciated.



RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1688 on: January 31, 2018, 01:49:06 pm »
+1
Show that if x>0, y>0 then
1/x2+1/y2>=8/(x+y)2

Please help, fully worked solution would be appreciated.





To provide some intuition:

Working backwards did not help at all here. As a more advanced technique, you should have proven \( a+b \ge 2\sqrt{ab} \) several times if you're up to questions of this calibre, so just assume that it's true and work with it. This was beneficial in collapsing the \(x^{-2}+y^{-2} \) into \( 2(xy)^{-1} \).

Now that we have something more manageable, we can work backwards again. It turns out that THIS time, working backwards actually got something relatively nice. So we use it.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2018, 02:00:03 pm by RuiAce »

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1689 on: January 31, 2018, 01:54:16 pm »
+1
Using expansion (x+ y + z)3, show that (x + y + z)3 >= 27xyz

I've written out expansion but cannot solve question. Any help appreciated.

\begin{align*}&\quad (x+y+z)^3\\&= x^3+y^3+z^3 + 3(x^2y+x^2z+y^2x+y^2z+z^2x+z^2y) + 6xyz\\ &= (x^3+y^3+z^3) + 3z(x^2+y^2) + 3y(x^2+z^2) + 3x(y^2+z^2) + 6xyz\\ &\ge (x^3+y^3+z^3) + 6zxy + 6yxz + 6xyz + 6xyz\\ &= x^3+y^3+z^3 + 24xyz \end{align*}

This is really just the AM-GM inequality with three variables. The AM-GM inequality with four variables is easy to prove, and you can use that one to prove the version with three variables.


To provide some intuition: Since we have to expand a cube involving three terms to prove something with \(xyz\) in the RHS, it was already extremely likely that \( a+b+c\ge 3\sqrt[3]{abc} \) would be useful (by simply letting \(a = x^3\) and etc.). But this is quite tedious to prove, and there's still no guarantee that it'd do all the magic. So I started by considering every other term.

The terms \(x^2y + xy^2 + x^2z+xz^2+y^2z+yz^2 \) all took the form something-squared plus something. Just like in the above case, \(a+b \ge 2\sqrt{ab} \) could have been really useful. But I didn't want renegade square roots appearing because there's no square root at all in what I'm trying to prove.
Since a square and square root cancel each other out when dealing with positive numbers, it made sense to apply that on the squares instead. Hence, I used \(x^2+y^2\ge 2xy \) instead of \( x+y \ge 2\sqrt{xy} \).

But of course, I had to rearrange the terms and do some factorising before I could even think of using that formula.

It was from there, I saw that I suddenly had almost all of the \(xyz\) in place (I already had 24 of them, and only needed 3 more). Well, the last 3 takes effort to get at, but at least I know I could get there
« Last Edit: January 31, 2018, 02:07:22 pm by RuiAce »

Lefkiiii6

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1690 on: January 31, 2018, 02:18:49 pm »
0
Prove that, if a>0, b>0, a4 + b4 > a3b + ab3 by writing expansion (a-b)4

Using x3+y3>=(x/z+y/z)xyz and similar expressions for y3+z3 and z3+x3 to deduce that x3+y3+z3>=3xyz.


These are two questions I am having trouble with. Can anyone help?

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1691 on: January 31, 2018, 02:24:20 pm »
+2
Prove that, if a>0, b>0, a4 + b4 > a3b + ab3 by writing expansion (a-b)4

Using x3+y3>=(x/z+y/z)xyz and similar expressions for y3+z3 and z3+x3 to deduce that x3+y3+z3>=3xyz.


These are two questions I am having trouble with. Can anyone help?

That second one is another famous way of proving the three-variable AM-GM inequality.




_______________________________________________________________



« Last Edit: January 31, 2018, 02:36:54 pm by RuiAce »

Lefkiiii6

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1692 on: January 31, 2018, 09:14:40 pm »
0
Ok thanks heaps for all that Rui and all your help in the past! I have another question. We didn't really cover cube roots of unity or roots of unity in general so I'm unsure about this stuff.

If 1, w1 and w2 are the cube roots of unity, prove that:

 w1 = conjugate of w2 = conjugate of (w2)2
w1 + w2 = -1
w1w2=1

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1693 on: February 01, 2018, 01:26:32 pm »
+2
Ok thanks heaps for all that Rui and all your help in the past! I have another question. We didn't really cover cube roots of unity or roots of unity in general so I'm unsure about this stuff.

If 1, w1 and w2 are the cube roots of unity, prove that:

 w1 = conjugate of w2 = conjugate of (w2)2 - Also, this bit is a mistake. It is equal to just \(w_2\,^2\); no conjugate.
w1 + w2 = -1
w1w2=1

Essentially, what the "cube roots of unity" means is just the "cube roots of 1". Hence the equation above.


Alternately, if we choose to use polynomials, and thus not explicitly evaluate w1 and w2



Also, you can just square \(w_2\) by hand, and you will see that it equals to \(w_1\).
________________________________________

(where \(w = w_1\))



Again, alternatively if we choose to use polynomials
This is easy to prove by just using the sum of roots.

The same goes for the product of roots for part 3.
The third part can be done by observing that \(w_1 w_2 = w w^2 = w^3 = 1\)

Edit: Tbh some bits of that might’ve been explained poorly. The thing to realise, however, is that w2^2 = w1 underlies a lot of the things we do with the cube roots of unity. This is why we usually never use w1 and w2, but prefer w and w^2 instead.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2018, 01:39:34 pm by RuiAce »

stesoo

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #1694 on: February 01, 2018, 09:20:53 pm »
0
Hi i need help with this q,
for a real number r, the polynomial 8x^3-4x^2-42x+45 is divisible by (x-r)^2. Find the value of r.

thanks