This is a more general question (with no specifics) - but its basically on how to do well at circle geometry.
Do you have any particular tips that could help in an exam situation when I'm stumped by the question. I've heard in general that there is a lot of cyclic quads, angles standing on the same arc etc. but I was wondering more if you had a particular process you would go through.
Thanks!!
You should be decently skilled (if not already mastered) circle geometry at the Extension 1 level before attempting problems that target Extension 2 students.
At the Extension 1 level, I was already familiar with what my theorems "LOOKED LIKE". What does this mean? Examples:
- Alternate angles look like Z angles on parallel lines
- Angles standing on same arc theorem looked like a nice M shape to me
- Alternate segment theorem involves a tangent and a triangle.
However how you visualise it may differ.
When I tackle an Extension 2 question, I don't label 50 thousand things at once if it's way too irrelevant. I work in one direction.
That is, I look at what I am trying to prove (or find).
Then I try to either work forwards, or backwards. That is, I look at the LHS or the RHS, then I start looking for an angle/side that equals to THAT ONLY. THEN, I keep going.
At the Extension 2 level you should also be prepared to manipulate lots of things. Similar triangles and cyclic quadrilaterals are examples of cliches, however even base angles of isosceles triangle are important. Equal radii is something I always keep at the back of my head regardless of if I need to use it.
Progressively, I build up to the final answer. But in doing so, I only consider RELEVANT information, not EXTRANEOUS information that may be useful for another part but not this present part.
A rare trap is the occurrence of trigonometry in circle geometry. When that happens, always look out for any right angled triangles BEFORE you attempt sine/cosine rule.