Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 29, 2024, 07:46:18 am

Author Topic: 4U Maths Question Thread  (Read 665235 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #885 on: February 26, 2017, 06:46:15 pm »
0
Hi, it would be great if I could get some help on this question.
1.
a) If w is a seventh root of 1, w does not equal to 1, show that w^3+w^2+w+1+1/w+1/w^2+1/w^3=0
b) By letting z=w +1/w reduce this equation into a cubic equation in z.
Thank you!!


____________________________________


VydekiE

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #886 on: February 26, 2017, 08:25:35 pm »
0
Thank you!!  :)

michaelalt

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #887 on: February 26, 2017, 10:03:25 pm »
0
Thanks Jake! Could you possibly help with this one as well? Its Q. 18 and I've drawn the diagram, but I don't know how to find the diagonal.

jakesilove

  • HSC Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1941
  • "Synergising your ATAR potential"
  • Respect: +196
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #888 on: February 26, 2017, 10:18:58 pm »
0
Thanks Jake! Could you possibly help with this one as well? Its Q. 18 and I've drawn the diagram, but I don't know how to find the diagonal.

Hey! Weird question; you're not usually asked to find the cartesian equation of something on the argand diagram. Still, let's think about what we know.

Firstly, the line must be perpendicular to the diagonal AC. This is important, because we can find the gradient of the first diagonal, and use that to find the perpendicular gradient. Secondly, the line must bisect the diagonal AC. Now, we have a gradient and a point; all we need to find the equation!

Let's replace A and C with points on the cartesian plane; A(0, 3) and C(4, -5). The gradient of the line between them will be



So, the gradient of the perpendicular line will be 1/2.

Now, the midpoint of AC is (2, -1). So, the cartesian equation of the line perpendicular to the diagonal AC will be





So, we get the equation



Great! That's the first part down. Now, the second point wants us to show that



Let's let z=x+iy




And we're done!
ATAR: 99.80

Mathematics Extension 2: 93
Physics: 93
Chemistry: 93
Modern History: 94
English Advanced: 95
Mathematics: 96
Mathematics Extension 1: 98

Studying a combined Advanced Science/Law degree at UNSW

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #889 on: February 26, 2017, 10:20:33 pm »
0
Thanks Jake! Could you possibly help with this one as well? Its Q. 18 and I've drawn the diagram, but I don't know how to find the diagonal.





Woah. Rare instance that Jake beat me.

jakesilove

  • HSC Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1941
  • "Synergising your ATAR potential"
  • Respect: +196
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #890 on: February 26, 2017, 10:21:47 pm »
0





Woah. Rare instance that Jake beat me.

Mate, I got one earlier today as well. Pick up your game son.
ATAR: 99.80

Mathematics Extension 2: 93
Physics: 93
Chemistry: 93
Modern History: 94
English Advanced: 95
Mathematics: 96
Mathematics Extension 1: 98

Studying a combined Advanced Science/Law degree at UNSW

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #891 on: February 26, 2017, 10:24:21 pm »
0
Mate, I got one earlier today as well. Pick up your game son.
What did you want me to whilst I was dining out 8)

jakesilove

  • HSC Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Part of the furniture
  • *******
  • Posts: 1941
  • "Synergising your ATAR potential"
  • Respect: +196
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #892 on: February 26, 2017, 10:26:07 pm »
+1
What did you want me to whilst I was dining out 8)

Ninja answer a 4U question under the table, obviously.
ATAR: 99.80

Mathematics Extension 2: 93
Physics: 93
Chemistry: 93
Modern History: 94
English Advanced: 95
Mathematics: 96
Mathematics Extension 1: 98

Studying a combined Advanced Science/Law degree at UNSW

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #893 on: February 26, 2017, 10:29:04 pm »
0
Man... This guy...
Ninja answer a 4U question under the table, obviously.

michaelalt

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #894 on: February 27, 2017, 09:01:11 am »
0
Hey! Weird question; you're not usually asked to find the cartesian equation of something on the argand diagram. Still, let's think about what we know.

Firstly, the line must be perpendicular to the diagonal AC. This is important, because we can find the gradient of the first diagonal, and use that to find the perpendicular gradient. Secondly, the line must bisect the diagonal AC. Now, we have a gradient and a point; all we need to find the equation!

Let's replace A and C with points on the cartesian plane; A(0, 3) and C(4, -5). The gradient of the line between them will be



So, the gradient of the perpendicular line will be 1/2.

Now, the midpoint of AC is (2, -1). So, the cartesian equation of the line perpendicular to the diagonal AC will be





So, we get the equation



Great! That's the first part down. Now, the second point wants us to show that



Let's let z=x+iy




And we're done!

This makes perfect sense. Thank you so much! The only thing that confused me was when you substituted the gradient of the perpendicular line into the (y=mx+b) equation. You stated earlier that the gradient would be 1/2, however, when you substitute it into the (y=mx+b) equation, you've written it as -1/2.

Thank you so much otherwise Jake!

michaelalt

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #895 on: February 27, 2017, 09:26:05 am »
0
Also if anyone could help me with this question.. Should I using De Moivre's theorem?

RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #896 on: February 27, 2017, 09:50:34 am »
0
This makes perfect sense. Thank you so much! The only thing that confused me was when you substituted the gradient of the perpendicular line into the (y=mx+b) equation. You stated earlier that the gradient would be 1/2, however, when you substitute it into the (y=mx+b) equation, you've written it as -1/2.

Thank you so much otherwise Jake!
Transcription error
Also if anyone could help me with this question.. Should I using De Moivre's theorem?

cutiepie30

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #897 on: February 27, 2017, 09:34:38 pm »
0
How would you do this question?


RuiAce

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8814
  • "All models are wrong, but some are useful."
  • Respect: +2575
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #898 on: February 27, 2017, 10:23:21 pm »
+1
« Last Edit: February 27, 2017, 10:25:33 pm by RuiAce »

cutiepie30

  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 41
  • Respect: 0
Re: 4U Maths Question Thread
« Reply #899 on: February 27, 2017, 11:51:30 pm »
0




_____


Thanks alot RuiAce  :) !!

i get how you get equation 1 and 2

but i dont get how you added equations 1 and 2 and simplified from there , could you please do those steps in more depth  :)

Also for your last case is it meant to be pi/4 for all real number and not pi/2?