I went through the exam and as past students have said and what some students have told me I thought it was a really standard methods exam 1. I don't think there were any questions that needed you to think outside the box for e.g. cone of death (2010) or 2016 question 8.
Common mistakes I see occurring would be:
Potential mistakes
Q1) Forgetting to x = 1 for part b
Q2) Giving the final answer as y= not f^-1 =
Q5) Asymptotes not drawn properly (graphs need to be not touching asymptotes, not curving away etc)
Q8) Forgetting to find a dilation factor for the equation (e.g. only looking at the x-intercepts to find the equation of the graph)
Q9) part f - possibly students trying to solve for a solution. More brute force and uneloquent methods probably works best for this one by graphing the equations approximately.
However, understanding students did this in exam conditions I don't think the A+ cut-off will be ridiculously high. I would expect something like 36-36.5/40.
For exam 2:I thought the probability/stats section was not covered well in exam 1 with just 6 relatively easy marks available there. So I would expect in exam 2 there will be a big extended question on this. Obviously you should also get your usual extended questions on functions/calculus.
Also if you didn't do too well on this exam remember that exam 1 is worth 22% of your final study score (your sacs are worth more than 1.5 times that (34%)). Also doing well on exam 2 is generally also more beneficial given the marks are usually distributed for the exams (e.g. less people scoring really high on exam 2's).
Good luck!