Hi Everyone,
I have been given a physics depth study recently, and I am wondering what exactly differentiates a Band 5 depth study from a Band 6 depth study?
Is it more in depth research? or including formula's within your explanations?
Any advice is much appreciated!
Coolmate
Hey Coolmate,
It really depends on the parameters of your depth study and the associated marking criteria but everything you've mentioned certainly differentiates a Band 5 from a Band 6. Here are a couple more pointers:
- If you need to assess the validity + accuracy + reliability of the primary/secondary investigation, you really need to know the difference between these terms, and not just acknowledge them under one 'umbrella'. Critically evaluate all aspects of your depth study.
- Clearly established inquiry question and a valid investigation (primary OR secondary) that addresses this question. Conclusion made that clearly reflects your findings.
- As you mentioned, include all appropriate Physics formulae. Perhaps derive such formulae if it is relevant to your depth study (e.g. if it is investigating circular motion)
- Your depth study should also be well-structured and clear.
- Research should indeed be in-depth, as you've pointed out, but try not to digress from the question at hand.
This list isn't exhaustive, but should point you in the right direction
I'd highly recommend reading your marking criteria if you have access to it and pay attention to the modality used in each mark bracket (e.g. a Band 5 might be "thorough" but a Band 6 might be "extensive")
Hope I could be of some assistance!