Regarding a misleading error in the PE 3+4 study guide description.

[enwiabe]

To all members of the forum, it was recently noticed that we had incorrectly printed in the PE 3+4 study guide description in the estore that one of the authors had received a study score of 50 in 2010. In fact, it was 49 in 2011. We don't want to be in the business of misleading students, and I apologise profusely for my error (this was purely my mistake - I went off faulty memory, rather than checking if it was correct) if the book being written by a recipient of a perfect score was a deciding factor in people's decisions to purchase the book. People who have pre-ordered the book have been contacted and informed of the error and offered a refund if requested.