Hi everyone,
Could someone please help me with questions regarding law and the required atar? Im probably not going to get the required atar but I know i want to do it eventually :/
1.Has anyone ever been accepted into law even though their atar was lower than the published required atar? (excluding any schemes)
If so when and which uni?
2.is it possible that after the atar is released unis would lower or raise the cut off? I want to get into ANU but this year is the first year that the atar is 98 (meaning that you can't use bonus points to get into law at ANU) so I know i dont have a chance to get in straight away at ANU.
3.Say if i can't do law during first year. What are the alternate pathways to law at USYD and UNSW?
Thanks first
1. I study law at Monash University in Victoria, whilst I got over the required ATAR, I do know a lot of people in my course who didn't get the required 98. In my year (2013) despite the cutoff being 98, 96 was sufficient to be accepted into law. Another positive is that law schools seem to be increasing their intake of law students every year, meaning the entry requirements are a little less strict.
2. Yes, universities can lower or raise the cut-off required. The 'clearly-in' ATAR was what was accepted last year and is only an indication of what will happen this year — it is dictated by demand for the spots available.
3. The most popular alternate method for getting into law is by internal transfer. I know of people who have gotten into Arts with ATARs of 85 and kept their WAM above 75 in their first year to be transferred into an Arts/Law double degree, so it is certainly very achievable. Also, even though this method means a transferee won't be studying law as soon as they'd like, it doesn't mean their degree is any longer, as they just get through their Arts degree faster.
The bottom line is, if you don't get the ATAR you'd hoped for, don't despair. If you work hard enough, in a year's time you will almost certainly be studying law!!