Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 28, 2024, 03:35:44 pm

Author Topic: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread  (Read 60944 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cosine

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3042
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #90 on: November 23, 2017, 03:36:06 pm »
Hey guys, so my wam just updated and its a subject worth 25 cred points, how can I work out what my grade is?

Thank you :)
2016-2019: Bachelor of Biomedicine
2015: VCE (ATAR: 94.85)

RKTR

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 613
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #91 on: November 23, 2017, 03:39:11 pm »
Hey guys, so my wam just updated and its a subject worth 25 cred points, how can I work out what my grade is?

Thank you :)
no. of subjects included in wam before the update = y
[wam now x ( y+2) - ( wam before x y)]/2
2015-2017: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Neuroscience)
2018: Doctor of Medicine (Withdrawn)
2019: Bachelor of Commerce (Actuarial Studies?)

sweetcheeks

  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 496
  • School: ---
  • School Grad Year: 2016
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #92 on: November 23, 2017, 03:52:50 pm »
has principles of finance affected WAMs yet?
Came out yesterday.

cosine

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3042
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #93 on: November 23, 2017, 04:04:24 pm »
no. of subjects included in wam before the update = y
[wam now x ( y+2) - ( wam before x y)]/2

Comes up with XX.40 so I must be doing something wrong haha
2016-2019: Bachelor of Biomedicine
2015: VCE (ATAR: 94.85)

fayato

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • School: University of Melbourne
  • School Grad Year: 2018
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #94 on: November 23, 2017, 04:05:13 pm »
FRST20014 finally got added to the WAM  :)

Maths Forever

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 160
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #95 on: November 23, 2017, 04:06:42 pm »
Does anyone know how scaling actually works with results? Is it the exam marks which are generally scaled or is it the final marks for the subject which are scaled?

If it is the final marks, would the subject coordinator say add 5 points to everybody's final mark, or would they add a different number of points depending on where you sit in the cohort (e.g. add 7 points to a score of 40 and add 3 points to a score of 80)?

If it is the exam they scale, do they add marks to everybody's exam score as above or do they change the total number of marks the exam is out of (e.g. change the total marks from 100 to 90 instead)?
« Last Edit: November 23, 2017, 04:11:45 pm by Maths Forever »
Currently studying at the University of Melbourne.

stolenclay

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 133
  • AN, pls.
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #96 on: November 23, 2017, 04:16:10 pm »
Does anyone know how scaling actually works with results? Is it the exam marks which are generally scaled or is it the final marks for the subject which are scaled?

If it is the final marks, would the subject coordinator say add 5 points to everybody's final mark, or would they add a different number of points depending on where you sit in the cohort (e.g. add 7 points to a score of 40 and add 3 points to a score of 80)?

If it is the exam they scale, do they add marks to everybody's exam score as above or do they change the total number of marks the exam is out of (e.g. change the total marks from 100 to 90 instead)?

I'm pretty sure there's no convention for what happens. If you want to know the precise method of scaling for a specific subject, it's probably best to ask the subject coordinator, although I'd expect them to say that it's confidential. The closest you can get without asking them directly would just be to view your exam and calculate your raw score yourself.
Thoughts on my journey through university
2014–2016 BCom (Actl), DipMathSc @ UoM
2017–2018 Master of Science (Mathematics and Statistics) @ UoM

Maths Forever

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 160
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #97 on: November 23, 2017, 04:18:46 pm »
I'm pretty sure there's no convention for what happens. If you want to know the precise method of scaling for a specific subject, it's probably best to ask the subject coordinator, although I'd expect them to say that it's confidential. The closest you can get without asking them directly would just be to view your exam and calculate your raw score yourself.

Thanks for your reply. You're probably right regarding confidentiality, since students don't generally find out exactly how marks are scaled.
Currently studying at the University of Melbourne.

myanacondadont

  • No exam discussion
  • Forum Obsessive
  • *
  • Posts: 301
  • School Grad Year: 2014
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #98 on: November 23, 2017, 04:19:52 pm »
Does anyone know how scaling actually works with results? Is it the exam marks which are generally scaled or is it the final marks for the subject which are scaled?

If it is the final marks, would the subject coordinator say add 5 points to everybody's final mark, or would they add a different number of points depending on where you sit in the cohort (e.g. add 7 points to a score of 40 and add 3 points to a score of 80)?

If it is the exam they scale, do they add marks to everybody's exam score as above or do they change the total number of marks the exam is out of (e.g. change the total marks from 100 to 90 instead)?


Echoing the words of Stolenclay above. However, have a look at the guidelines on standardisation on the unimelb site:

https://policy.unimelb.edu.au/MPF1326#section-4.25

Have a look at section 4.90 - "Whenever adjustment takes place it must be documented and transparent, and the method defined and available to students."
So, technically, under university guidelines it appears to me that any standardisation must be available to students - whether that means you have to ask them? I'm not sure.

stolenclay

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 133
  • AN, pls.
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #99 on: November 23, 2017, 04:24:32 pm »
Echoing the words of Stolenclay above. However, have a look at the guidelines on standardisation on the unimelb site:

https://policy.unimelb.edu.au/MPF1326#section-4.25

Have a look at section 4.90 - "Whenever adjustment takes place it must be documented and transparent, and the method defined and available to students."
So, technically, under university guidelines it appears to me that any standardisation must be available to students - whether that means you have to ask them? I'm not sure.

This is interesting... I'd say it may be worth a try then if you're comfortable telling them that this policy makes it necessary for them to tell you. If anything, I would bring it up at the exam viewing; I personally wouldn't react very well to someone telling me in an email that I have to disclose something to them because of a policy that I didn't know about.
Thoughts on my journey through university
2014–2016 BCom (Actl), DipMathSc @ UoM
2017–2018 Master of Science (Mathematics and Statistics) @ UoM

Maths Forever

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 160
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #100 on: November 23, 2017, 04:33:05 pm »
Echoing the words of Stolenclay above. However, have a look at the guidelines on standardisation on the unimelb site:

https://policy.unimelb.edu.au/MPF1326#section-4.25

Have a look at section 4.90 - "Whenever adjustment takes place it must be documented and transparent, and the method defined and available to students."
So, technically, under university guidelines it appears to me that any standardisation must be available to students - whether that means you have to ask them? I'm not sure.

This is interesting... I'd say it may be worth a try then if you're comfortable telling them that this policy makes it necessary for them to tell you. If anything, I would bring it up at the exam viewing; I personally wouldn't react very well to someone telling me in an email that I have to disclose something to them because of a policy that I didn't know about.

Thanks for your replies! If I view my exam and I have a reason to suspect the exam was scaled, I'll ask the coordinator. :)


Currently studying at the University of Melbourne.

RKTR

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 613
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #101 on: November 23, 2017, 04:35:08 pm »
Comes up with XX.40 so I must be doing something wrong haha
ah 2nd semester of 2nd year biomed means you did MCB already right? count MCB as 2 subjects. if it still isn't right then another subject is also included already
2015-2017: Bachelor of Biomedicine (Neuroscience)
2018: Doctor of Medicine (Withdrawn)
2019: Bachelor of Commerce (Actuarial Studies?)

Broseph

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #102 on: November 23, 2017, 04:46:23 pm »
Anyone know if BLaw is out?

Shadowxo

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 983
  • Graphing is where I draw the line.
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #103 on: November 23, 2017, 05:16:56 pm »
1-2 hours ago another subject came out, it's either physics 2 (PST), ESD2 or Linear Algebra (guessing engineering?). Right now two out of those three should be out :)
Completed VCE 2016
2015: Biology
2016: Methods | Physics | Chemistry | Specialist Maths | Literature
ATAR : 97.90
2017: BSci (Maths and Engineering) at MelbUni
Feel free to pm me if you have any questions!

Mali_nay

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: [UoM] 2017 Semester 2 Results Thread
« Reply #104 on: November 23, 2017, 05:27:02 pm »
1-2 hours ago another subject came out, it's either physics 2 (PST), ESD2 or Linear Algebra (guessing engineering?). Right now two out of those three should be out :)

Its esd2