Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 21, 2024, 11:52:26 am

Author Topic: Suggested improvements and extensions, is this good?  (Read 1351 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jinx_58

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 143
  • "I am not afraid to walk this world alone" - MCR
  • Respect: +22
Suggested improvements and extensions, is this good?
« on: July 14, 2022, 07:04:58 pm »
0
Greetings all.

Below is my suggested improvements and extensions paragraph, I just wanted ask if someone could please look over it and tell me if I need to improve anything.
For context, my research question is: When comparing the Ring Laser Gyroscope (RLG), Fibre Optic Gyroscope (FOG) and the Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) gyroscope sensor, which is less impacted by temperature bias, hence providing greater accuracy?
The claim is: Ring Laser gyroscopes (RLG) are the best kind of navigation systems

This my suggested improvements and extensions paragraph:
To improve the investigation, more recent data should be obtained and compared against to reach more accurate conclusions. Another improvement would be to account for other factors that negatively impact the functionality of the RLG, such as magnetic-field variation and vibrations from other sources. An extension would be to investigate temperature bias in a wider range of navigation systems to further support the claim. Another extension would be to investigate the factors of the RLG that make it the best navigation system, such as scale factor. An extension would be to investigate multiple aspects of the RLG and other navigation systems, and compare them to support the claim.

Any help will be appreciated!
 -jinx_58

P.S. For further context, let me know :)
Class of 2022!
Currently doing Unit 4: QCE
Physics || Chemistry ||Methods || General English || Ancient History || Religion & Ethics
My Year 12 QCE Journal!