Login

Search the forums now!

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 27, 2024, 11:41:12 pm
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: SAC 3 Results  (Read 3714 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

HERculina

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1209
  • To ∞ and beyond
  • Respect: +11
  • School: St. Trinians
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #15 on: May 27, 2011, 06:23:35 pm »
0
will it get scaled up?
i know someone from macrob who got 70 percent raw for enzyme sac but then it got officially scaled up to 88 by VCAA cause ALL the teachers sent the sacs to VCAA to remark them and different marks were put in in a different colour at the end.
Logged
------------------------------------------------------> :D <-----------------------------------------------------

iNerd

  • Guest
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #16 on: May 27, 2011, 06:59:19 pm »
0
OOO IT'S FINALLY BACK?

haha my friend told me it had to get 'audited'.

got to ask her how she went now :P
Logged

iNerd

  • Guest
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #17 on: May 27, 2011, 08:21:26 pm »
0
Quote from: Bazza16 on May 27, 2011, 07:45:05 pm
how did she get it audited?

Errr didn't Herclues just say they got sent off to VCAA ---> audited = technical term for "sent off"

Quote from: Hercules on May 27, 2011, 06:23:35 pm
will it get scaled up?
i know someone from macrob who got 70 percent raw for enzyme sac but then it got officially scaled up to 88 by VCAA cause ALL the teachers sent the sacs to VCAA to remark them and different marks were put in in a different colour at the end.
Logged

Christiano

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 411
  • Why, Hello There
  • Respect: +12
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #18 on: May 27, 2011, 10:55:02 pm »
0
22/25 .. Bye bye to #1 rank - 90% of the cohort got under 20, the 10% who got over, have been consistently getting A-A+ :(

Next SAC is so dodgy .. a poster ?!  :idiot2:
Logged
2010: Legal Studies [34]
2011: English [41] Italian [27], Further Mathematics [32], Biology[40], Chemistry[34]
90.65 ATAR
2012: Bachelor of Laws/Bachelor of Finance @ La Trobe University

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #19 on: May 28, 2011, 10:42:13 am »
0
Quote from: Christiano on May 27, 2011, 10:55:02 pm
Next SAC is so dodgy .. a poster ?!  :idiot2:

Always better than a website, those really suck...
Logged

dooodyo

  • Guest
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #20 on: May 28, 2011, 10:54:09 pm »
0
@atar: what happened to the 50 in psychology haha?
since you ruled out the including 50 square bracket.
Logged

iNerd

  • Guest
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #21 on: May 28, 2011, 10:56:08 pm »
0
Quote from: dooodyo on May 28, 2011, 10:54:09 pm
@atar: what happened to the 50 in psychology haha?
since you ruled out the including 50 square bracket.
Err my aim was always 45, never 50....tbh the domain should be [40,50) but just incase I burn on exam day it's (0,50) :P
You'll find people who aim for 50 in the Psych roll call - burbs comes to mind ::) :P
« Last Edit: May 28, 2011, 10:58:09 pm by ATAR »
Logged

Truck

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 870
  • Respect: +122
  • School: who needs school when you got SWAG?
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #22 on: May 28, 2011, 11:22:27 pm »
0
Quote from: ATAR on May 28, 2011, 10:56:08 pm
Quote from: dooodyo on May 28, 2011, 10:54:09 pm
@atar: what happened to the 50 in psychology haha?
since you ruled out the including 50 square bracket.
Err my aim was always 45, never 50....tbh the domain should be [40,50) but just incase I burn on exam day it's (0,50) :P
You'll find people who aim for 50 in the Psych roll call - burbs comes to mind ::) :P

Aim for the moon, even if you miss you'll land among the stars ;).

But seriously, out of all the people I know doing Psych, you ACTUALLY have the best chance to get a 50. So as far as I'm concerned that's your aim!
« Last Edit: May 28, 2011, 11:24:00 pm by teewreck »
Logged
#yolo #thuglife #swaggotandproud

Inspirations: Mahtama Ghandi, T-Pain, The Caped Crusader and Ayn Rand.

Base

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 56
  • Respect: 0
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #23 on: May 29, 2011, 06:04:39 pm »
0
22/25. Got some really easy questions wrong. -.-

Better than what I expected though.
Logged
2011 - Biology [38]
2012 - Specialist Maths [34], Maths Methods [40], Chemistry [33], Physics [36], English [34]
Atar - 94.25

WhoTookMyUsername

  • Guest
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #24 on: May 31, 2011, 04:31:24 pm »
0
I got my SAC back, i got a low A which probably means around 19/25

Not as bad as i expected, at one stage i was fearing a C

We had 1 A+ in our class and 2 low As

Though not a good mark, it doesn't completely rule me out of a decent rank, i simply need to improve to my teacher's standard and churn out some 24 and 25/25 s
i think my average is around 22 at the moment which is not as bad as it could have been
Logged

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #25 on: May 31, 2011, 06:49:05 pm »
0
[offtopic]

[confused]
Was that iNerd (who is now a guest) the same person who was ATAR who was previously iNerd? And if so, banned or quit?

I though that iNerd was some guy pretending to be ATAR...
[/confused]

[/offtopc]

Logged

Russ

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8442
  • Respect: +661
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #26 on: May 31, 2011, 07:03:38 pm »
0
ATAR originally registered under the name iNerd. When he had his username changed, it only affected the name displayed - the entry in the SQL database remained the same. When he deleted that account, it reverted to iNerd.

He was not banned, he chose to delete that account
Logged

Russ

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 8442
  • Respect: +661
Re: SAC 3 Results
« Reply #27 on: May 31, 2011, 08:14:55 pm »
0
As far as I know, he never had multiple accounts
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up