Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

May 03, 2024, 11:02:48 am

Author Topic: Nagisa Maths Thread  (Read 21320 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Nagisa

  • New South Welsh
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 114
  • Respect: -7
  • School: Lismore High
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #30 on: December 26, 2012, 01:40:35 am »
0
















im learning integration by parts atm so i was wanting a solution by that method...

anyways this is what ive done and i think im stuck but ye #yolo





so 



so then i did this

help plss

Hancock

  • SUPER ENGINEERING MAN
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • Respect: +270
  • School: Ringwood Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #31 on: December 26, 2012, 01:59:18 am »
+2


   
   






Need to do integration by parts again on the integral to the right.

   
   





Putting this back into the top equation:













Thinking of doing Engineering? - Engineering FAQs

2012 - 2014: B.Sc. - Mechanical Systems - The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2014: Cross-Institutional Study - Aero/Mech Engineering - Monash University
2015 - 2016: M.Eng (Mechanical with Business) - The University of Melbourne
2015 - Sem1: Exchange Semester - ETH Zurich

Nagisa

  • New South Welsh
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 114
  • Respect: -7
  • School: Lismore High
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #32 on: December 26, 2012, 02:03:18 am »
0
thanks man, dont know why you had to show off ur complex integration skills(wasnt needed). but ye i wasnt movin them fractions around enough. TY BEBCAKZ

Hancock

  • SUPER ENGINEERING MAN
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • Respect: +270
  • School: Ringwood Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #33 on: December 26, 2012, 02:07:26 am »
0
Personally I find it heaps quicker and easier using the complex exponential than double int by parts; hence why I did it that way first.

Sozza b^3 :P
Thinking of doing Engineering? - Engineering FAQs

2012 - 2014: B.Sc. - Mechanical Systems - The University of Melbourne
2014 - 2014: Cross-Institutional Study - Aero/Mech Engineering - Monash University
2015 - 2016: M.Eng (Mechanical with Business) - The University of Melbourne
2015 - Sem1: Exchange Semester - ETH Zurich

b^3

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3529
  • Overloading, just don't do it.
  • Respect: +631
  • School: Western Suburbs Area
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #34 on: December 26, 2012, 02:08:39 am »
0
Personally I find it heaps quicker and easier using the complex exponential than double int by parts; hence why I did it that way first.

Sozza b^3 :P
Turns out I integrated e^(2x)*cos(3x) instead of e^(2x)*sin(3x) anyways :P.... I need sleep.. :P
2012-2016: Aerospace Engineering/Science (Double Major in Applied Mathematics - Monash Uni)
TI-NSPIRE GUIDES: METH, SPESH

Co-Authored AtarNotes' Maths Study Guides


I'm starting to get too old for this... May be on here or irc from time to time.

Nagisa

  • New South Welsh
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 114
  • Respect: -7
  • School: Lismore High
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #35 on: December 26, 2012, 07:24:42 pm »
0
evaluate the integral

b^3

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3529
  • Overloading, just don't do it.
  • Respect: +631
  • School: Western Suburbs Area
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #36 on: December 26, 2012, 07:43:06 pm »
+1


EDIT: It's probably not best to show the line but I've put it in there to show how we canceled the other term out when we change the variables, also the first step comes from the fact that
« Last Edit: December 26, 2012, 07:46:17 pm by Indian Battman »
2012-2016: Aerospace Engineering/Science (Double Major in Applied Mathematics - Monash Uni)
TI-NSPIRE GUIDES: METH, SPESH

Co-Authored AtarNotes' Maths Study Guides


I'm starting to get too old for this... May be on here or irc from time to time.

Nagisa

  • New South Welsh
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 114
  • Respect: -7
  • School: Lismore High
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #37 on: December 26, 2012, 08:00:53 pm »
0
thx battman, i got same thing. and the line to help me understand ur working was nice thankyou

Nagisa

  • New South Welsh
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 114
  • Respect: -7
  • School: Lismore High
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #38 on: December 26, 2012, 08:04:31 pm »
0
now im havin trouble with  not sure wat to do when substituting.

b^3

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3529
  • Overloading, just don't do it.
  • Respect: +631
  • School: Western Suburbs Area
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #39 on: December 26, 2012, 08:09:35 pm »
+4
Try using the double angle formula for cos, so that you get
and , from that you should be able to manipulate it again so that you get another use of the tule above except with and .

Hope that helps.
2012-2016: Aerospace Engineering/Science (Double Major in Applied Mathematics - Monash Uni)
TI-NSPIRE GUIDES: METH, SPESH

Co-Authored AtarNotes' Maths Study Guides


I'm starting to get too old for this... May be on here or irc from time to time.

polar

  • Guest
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #40 on: December 26, 2012, 08:21:11 pm »
+2
Spoiler

hopefully I've done all the brackets right this time  ;D

Nagisa

  • New South Welsh
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 114
  • Respect: -7
  • School: Lismore High
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #41 on: December 26, 2012, 08:38:51 pm »
0
hopefully I've done all the brackets right this time  ;D

hahaha ur a legend polar ty once again

Nagisa

  • New South Welsh
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 114
  • Respect: -7
  • School: Lismore High
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #42 on: December 27, 2012, 12:04:16 am »
0
Evaluate

















it seems correct but im not sure of myself lol can anyone check it or post their opinion?

b^3

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3529
  • Overloading, just don't do it.
  • Respect: +631
  • School: Western Suburbs Area
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #43 on: December 27, 2012, 12:08:11 am »
+1
The line

isn't entirely correct since you have an and you integrated with respect to and you canceled a out that wasn't there for the . What you should have done is to split the integral up, work on the first part and cancel the out and then just integrate the on it's own.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2012, 12:10:10 am by Indian Battman »
2012-2016: Aerospace Engineering/Science (Double Major in Applied Mathematics - Monash Uni)
TI-NSPIRE GUIDES: METH, SPESH

Co-Authored AtarNotes' Maths Study Guides


I'm starting to get too old for this... May be on here or irc from time to time.

Nagisa

  • New South Welsh
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 114
  • Respect: -7
  • School: Lismore High
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Nagisa Maths Thread
« Reply #44 on: December 27, 2012, 12:15:56 am »
0
The line

isn't entirely correct since you have an and you integrated with respect to and you canceled a out that wasn't there for the . What you should have done is to split the integral up, work on the first part and cancel the out and then just integrate the on it's own.

yea i see, thankyou man