hey guys would someone mind describing the lung cancer dot point for epidemiology? Do we have to know the names of specific studies?
Thanks!!
I think just know a brief outline of the epidemiological study by Hill and Doll from the 50's in the UK
so like the case study: by collecting data on the occurrence of the disease to identify the impacts of age, race, geographic specificity
e.g. lung cancer incidence was higher in UK than Japan and try to form a hypothesis for the etiology of the disease (E.g. could be due to increased smoking since WW2 or from increased construction of roads etc)
then they did a case control by determining the frequency of the determinant (smoking) in diseased and non diseased individuals
e.g. they asked 650 lung cancer sufferers and only 2 didn't smoke --> so there is a correlation b/w smoking and lung cancer
but this sample size was too small so they did a cohort study following 40,000 doctors for like 40 years or something where they one group is exposed to the determinant whereas the other isn't (analytical study)
and then Doll found the odds ratio b/w smoking and lung cancer to be like 9.01 and anything above 1 suggests there is a causal relationship
hope this is right lol
not sure if u needa know that much detail