Yay! Finally some improvement. Went from 12/20 in an essay to 18/20. My teacher recommended me to have more examples from beyond 2000, but at least I know what type of essay he wants. I made like a 5 minute plan, which helped me stick to the question throughout (majority - still the odd mistake).
Alas, I dropped from 25/30, 28/32 to 20 and a half/30 for a short answer SAC. This SAC was rather difficult and I made a few silly mistakes, e.g. instead of saying that the President doesn't have the power to legislate, I said it did. Also "Bill/Charter of Rights", I didn't know the USA only referred to it as a Bill. Electoral Colleges I will have to study for a little better.
Even though it is a woeful mark worthy of demolition, I still do not feel panicked by the short answer questions as previous to this I was going ok, and hey maybe it's a good thing I am not peaking this time around! E.g. I was getting 28/30 for short answer practices in Australian Democracy (AOS1) and pulled a measly 25/30 next time around (the one where it mattered!).
I am also planning my revision sheets. E.g. one for the study design and one for potential SAC questions. Using various highlighters, key words and dot points. Does anyone have any feedback on this; I am confident in my processes (every so often) but I am open to criticism.
Also just on a side-note, my teacher said that whilst he thinks (not sure if I do) I have a very strong work ethic, he claims that I am too pedantic about specific details and that I should back myself because "I know more than I realise" (according to the teacher). I feel as though this may be true but is this something to be cursed? I.e. if I don't know one dot point for a Politics SAC coming up, that is a potential 2 - 4 marks gone. And in the last SAC, I got caught out in this regard. Thoughts?
Thank you everyone for the help previously!