Hi, what are the techniques used to graph y = f(x2)?
Thankyou!!
When what's inside the \(f\) gets altered there usually isn't any strategy. I just rely on common sense.
Common sense here suggests that I break up the cases for positive \(x\) and negative \(x\) first. (We can put \(x=0\) with the positive ones or just do that one separately.)
I have \(y=f(x)\) sitting in front of me. I now do \(y=f(x^2)\). So if I put in \(x=2\), I don't get \(f(2)\) anymore, but rather \(f(4)\).
When I put in \(x=5\), I don't get \(f(5)\) anymore, but rather \(f(25)\). Effectively speaking, I'm getting something further away from the \(x\)-axis
closer to it
So if \(x > 1\), I'm really just squeezing the graph inwards. But I'm squeezing it at a faster rate as \(x\) grows bigger.
Then, I could do a similar analogy with \( 0 < x < 1\). If i'm careful enough, I'll see that the graph expands outwards from the \(y\)-axis.
And of course, since at \(x=0\) we have \(f(x^2)=f(0)\) as well, and similarly for \(x=1\), nothing changes between \(y=f(x)\) and \(y=f(x^2)\) for these two specific values.
You won't be able to get a perfectly accurate sketch, because you're just squeezing things. But you should be able to see the idea after you do some simulations on GeoGebra/Desmos.
And lastly, for negative \(x\)? That is just a matter of reflecting whatever you've done for positive \(x\) over into the left of the \(y\)-axis as well. You should be able to see why that's the case.