For the last question, I done part b, which was relating the adversary system to the inquisitorial system, and if we should adopt that approach. I basically spoke about the pact that in the adversary system the judge is impartial, and this limits the expertise and knowledge allowed to be expressed by the judge, since the parties play the predominant role, and hence, this feature should not be adopted by the adversary system. I also spoke about the need for legal representation in the adversary system, and the fact that they are not essentially required in the inquisitorial system, since the judge is in charge of the case. This is less expensive and time consuming, and should be considered in more detail in relation to adopting this feature to the adversary system. Then I spoke about the fact that strict rules for procedure need to be followed in the adversary system, but are not as important in the inquisitorial system, which allows for some evidence to be unjustified in the inquisitorial system, as parties are not presenting their cases, but rather a third party, who may have limited knowledge on the case.
And I still didn't get full marks for it.
Home
Help
Search
Login
