The ones I have:
Trace decay theory
-Memory decay merely describes the fact of forgetting, not the processes that cause it.
-is difficult to test for verbal material because if participants are tested after different retention intervals, they could well be rehearsing the material thus strengthening the trace.
Interference theory
-Interference theory suffers as a general theory of forgetting because the situations it best deals with are rarely encountered in everyday life. We do not often have to learn similar verbal responses to the same stimuli within a short period of time. Experimental studies of interference lack ecological validity.
-Solso, 1995 has pointed out that studies of interference have largely involved Episodic Memory and whereas this demonstrates that episodic memory may be subject to interference, Semantic Memory is likely to be more resistant.
Motivated forgetting
-The notion of actively blocking the memories we are trying to access is qualitatively different from any other explanation of forgetting and it is a phenomenon that would be useful to investigate in the laboratory. However, to do this the experimenter would need to have the participant
experience something very traumatic and this is not feasible for ethical reasons. (In order words: it is difficult to test under lab conditions)
-Most forgetting cannot be explained in terms of repression.