Much easier to downvote someone than to struggle to attempt to justify allowing kids and teens to legally purchase a potentially very harmful drug.
Bit hard to say they are tired of making rebuttals when the total number of rebuttals they have made is 0 lol
Except we have? You just don't agree with us, which is fine. My justification for legalising cannabis (for people over the age of 18? I'm unsure as to where you got the impression we were suggesting minors should be exposed to any mind affecting substance), which I have already outlined, is this;
- It is provably less harmful than many other legal substances
- Those who consume cannabis are typically less of a risk to others than those who consume other legal substances
- Criminalisation will not stop people purchasing cannabis and using it recreationally, but it WILL reduce the number of people who will seek help if they do become dependant on the substance as they may be worried about potential criminal charges.
- Criminalisation means that the cannabis currently being sold is not regulated, taxed, policed or quality controlled, meaning that it may be laced with other substances the consumer may be unaware of.
- If it was legalised, we can better control how much an individual has access to.
- If it was legalised, that would be a MASSIVE blow to drug dealers, who would lose most of their market.
If you disagree with the above points, that's cool! But please don't ruin what has been for the most part a pleasant, tolerant and insightful debate by delegitimising all of the people who just happen to disagree with you.
Cannabis smoked puts you at a risk of lung cancer as anything else smoked to the lungs does.
(processed meat is a grade 1 carcinogen. you know. the type of meat you find in. fast food.)