First of all, I love your journal - I can definitely relate to lots of your thoughts.
What is your opinion on the change in fees? I am assuming you are against it.
I think objectively, it's good, because I feel as if we have an over-allocation of intelligent people in fields such as finance, when those smart people would likely provide a greater benefit to society if they were in STEM fields.
Humanity really has got to where it is today because of advancements in science and tech, so it seems logical that the more smart people we have working in that field, the more technological progress we'll make.
I'm interested to hear your perspective though
Thank you very much.
Personally and frankly, I'm against it but I can totally understand that this matter can be viewed as a double-edged sword. I can see an over-allocation of labour resources in other fields such as Arts, Commerce etc. substantiated by the number of enrolments in the respective courses especially in the bachelor of arts. Moreover, I do see the fact that Australia's global status in the STEM fields is low compared to other powerful countries such as the USA, Germany, China etc.
However, I may be wrong, but I see and personally know a lot of very high-achievers and promising, intelligent, passionate high school graduates are pursing a STEM degree and a number of years later would be amply ready to tackle problems in the science field that humanity encounters/ed. Moreover, with the planned implementation of the 'fee hike', some people feel like this ruins their subject selections especially for the class of 2020 and would change it quite considerably if they knew about the increased-debt they'll have to pay earlier, possibly constraining their choices and forcefully take on subjects and careers that they dislike. I'm also guided along the belief that motivation comes from passion and it can be conspired that if the latter is materialised, then from this perspective our productivity levels would drop sharply and on account of that our society wouldn't be able to function properly as we need all the sectors to be thriving for it to harmoniously function.
I definitely can relate to the Minister for Education Dan Tehan's words that "the fee changes will incentivise prospective students" but a dear friend of mine proposed a solution to the lack of students engaging in a STEM degree is to simply and only lower the tuition costs for the STEM degrees ever more, which I second that and imo can be theoretically achieved through greater subsidisation from the state or federal government.