^and to add to above, the reason I use DFAT more (but not always) is simply a reaction to AusAID. DFAT is quicker to write, and I'd find myself shortening 'Australian aid' to 'Aus aid', which is grey area; you could lose a mark for saying that. So I steer clear of all risks with a quicker DFAT.
I don't know what to say for the roles Australia's Government plays (For this dot point: 'the priorities of the Australian Government’s aid initiatives and the role it plays in developing programs to improve global health and sustainable human development')
EDIT: Is it just like for Effective Governance - Provide Advice to governments and so on?
They're
very unlikely to give you an open-ended question like 'What are the roles the Australian Government plays in promoting SHD?' Though you may get, what is
one way the govt promotes SHD, in which case you'd pick on anything specific like 'provide advice to governments to help with blah, which helps these governments to blah blah and thus achieve SHD'.
Anyway, I'd divide this dot point into two parts:
- the priorities of the Aus govt's aid initiatives
- the role the govt plays in developing programs.
Hence, they would most likely ask you
a. How the govt uses priorities (either a specific one, or your choice) to promote SHD - pick a few examples and say how that impacts SHD.
b. How the govt uses one program to promote SHD - just explain a program like you would any other.
Hope that answers your question!