Thank you! So is BRCSD from the Ottawa Charter the thing that you would write if they asked you for the points on the social model of health?
Nope, they're different.
If you're asked for the areas or priorities of the social model of health, it's these five:
-addresses the broader determinants of health
-involves inter-sectoral collaboration
-acts to reduce social inequities
-empowers individuals and communities
-acts to enable access to health care
If you're asked for the action areas of the Ottawa Charter, it's these five:
- build healthy public policy
- reorient health services
- create supportive environments
- strengthen community action
- develop personal skills
(That's the BRCSD thingo).
For both of these, you'd have to write a priority/action area word-perfect to get the mark. You could be asked to:
- list 2 social model priorities/Ottawa areas
- explain 1-2 priorities/areas (describe what they're about/what they aim to achieve/something like that)
- explain how a certain case study shows a 1-2 priorities/areas
... and make sure you're referring to the right collection, it's common for people to put down Ottawa Charter areas when the question asks for social model priorities.
It's very likely that one of these will be asked, so if you want to cram anything, this is a good thing to cram.
Also do we need to know the objectives of Nutrition Australia word for word? ('act as a source of scientific information on key nutrition issues', etc.) Or do you think we might get away with making something up on the spot? Like 'provide a scientifically backed up source of nutritional information and nutritional recommendations' or something along those lines?
Also does Nutrition Australia 'own' the Australian Dietary Guidelines, Australian Guide To Healthy Eating & Healthy Eating Pyramid? Or are they developed by someone other than Nutrition Australia?
Thanks again!!
Defs don't need to know those, and yeah, ADG/AGHE are federal govt things, Healthy Eating Pyramid is Nutrition Aus.