Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 27, 2024, 04:33:31 pm

Author Topic: VCAA EXAMS-Easiest to Hardest?  (Read 12325 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

psyxwar

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1354
  • Respect: +81
Re: VCAA EXAMS-Easiest to Hardest?
« Reply #30 on: November 02, 2014, 02:10:57 pm »
0
I think the way that question was created was meant to separate students. The exam panel creates separate marking schemes for each exams - so they don't always have to give you method marks, all the marks can go to the answer only -  and so if you didn't get the gradient right, the remaining questions remained inaccessible according to my teacher, who marked last year's exam.

It stops sneaky people making the gradient be something easy like "1" or "a" and do the rest of the question hoping to get conseqs when if you did it using the actual correct answer, it would be a lot harder.
Wait wot, this doesnt make any sense for tech active where your CAS does everything for you
VCE 2013-2014
MD/BMedSci 2015-2020

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: VCAA EXAMS-Easiest to Hardest?
« Reply #31 on: November 02, 2014, 05:21:40 pm »
0
Yeah but from memory the gradient function was something like "square root m -4". Then you had to find the area function (and the terminals for the integral were messed up as well I think) and that would have been really convoluted because you had to integrate with unknowns.

THEN you had to derive area function to find max/min which would have been harder with square root m-4 than a variable "a" or a random positive constant.

If you made it a simple constant like 'a" or a integer value like "1", you make it really easy for yourself in an unfair way because you don't have m or square roots (or whatever) in your area function since your equation is much more simplified.

Debatable. If you REALLY wanted to, you could have just stated 'let gradient = m' and then at the end m for the gradient back into what you got.
If anything, having an explicit gradient potentially makes it easier as there might be a possibility of some simplification involved by virtue of what the gradient is. For instance, if you have derivative of (x^x * f(x)), that's a pain to do normally, but if f(x) happens to equal 2x^-x, the derivative is trivial. See what I mean by possible simplification?
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details