Hello, at my school for HSC chemistry, the option we are doing is Industrial Chemistry.
Although, 3 weeks ago, I had decided to go away from this option and do Forensic Chemistry instead. I had my reasons (ie I knew that i'd do better in it, as I found it more interesting and the questions were more my style, where in the long run; I would score higher marks. etc)
This was all fine, I wrote my notes, and understood the whole topic over the holidays and I was planning to be doing the topic of Forensics in my trials.
This was all fine until today, when I was called in to the head of curriculum where they told me I can do forensic in the HSC test, but not in the Trials, where I had to do Industrial. This is a problem as the paper is in 1 week 2 days, and I would need to learn half of the Industrial topic (basically rendering my other study for other topics redundant.)
There reason on why I HAD to do industrial were:
1) The assessment sheet for Trials said Industrial
2) It would be difficult to scale me to the rest of the peers (even though I said it would be harder for me as I learnt the whole topic while they have done half)
3) I would be at a disadvantage (which I agree, and am willing to understand this is the potential consequences.)
HOWEVER
In physics a couple years ago, My physics teacher said that he had a student who did another option, but he did his own option in the trials.
So......
My question is
WHAT DO I DO?
Is there anything on the NESA site about this?
Why was the other student allowed, but not me?
How screwed am I?
Thank you for reading, I really appreciate it.
My optimal standing would be to do forensic in the trial paper, but I now honestly feel more screwed and more disadvantaged being forced to do industrial (this is 25% of the paper)