Hey there,
Multiple choice for me was the easiest section of the paper cos it was the one that didnt require endless amounts of planning and thinking and writing (hated writing essays).
But many questions do become tricky... my legal studies teacher was a huge advocate for improving multiple choice because it is so much easier to your overall score through improving multiple choice (14 to 16) than it is to improve an essay from 18 to 19.
One of the ways i tried to go about multiple choice was to go through each answer and cross out the specific part of that answer which was wrong. This is especially helpful for answers that have 2 parts to them
e.g. if question is "Michael travels by public transport to his office in the city. He has been caught travelling without a valid ticket. What type of offences have been committed? (2015 HSC Exam Q3)
(A) Summary and public order
(B) Summary and strict liability
(C) White collar and public order
(D) White collar and strict liability
For A I would cross out the part of the answer that is wrong so would cross out the public order bit.
Then I would continue to do that for each answer. Even if I thought answer B was right, I would still look at C and D and then cross out those if they are wrong.
For Legal Studies, MC only come out of Crime and HR so there is less content that is examinable. It should be noticed that a lot more of the questions are focusing on scenarios and applying the knowledge rather than defining or identifying what a legal mechanism is.
I do this a lot with my economics students right now but we do multiple choice questions out loud and they have to tell me why each answer is wrong and why the correct one is right. This is really good as it gets them to explain their reasoning and analyse their own thoughts. Definitely try this out (maybe with someone else so you're not weirdly talking to yourself)
Let me know if you need any clarification for these.
Isaac