Hi guys!
If I got a question asking:
"Evaluate the way courts and VCAT operate to resolve disputes" (8 marks)
this is comparative right?
at the end would i have to make a statement over which one i think is more effective in resolving disputes?i'm also
really confused with structure:
so if this was a comparative evaluate question and i thought that vcat was better, would i structure it like,
"strength of vcat as linking to corresponding weakness of the courts"
like for example:
Firstly, VCAT is much cheaper alternative of dispute resolution. This is because legal representation is not necessary and parties are instead able to represent themselves. Furthermore, in many cases parties are only required to pay a nominal amount for filing their claim. Conversely, in the courts legal representation significantly increases the costs faced by both parties as court fees are far more expensive in comparison to tribunals.
so yeah, basically, is this question comparative? should i be choosing an objective side (like vcat better or courts better)? and how am i structuring it, is this the right way, could someone please critique what i've written? thank you guys!