Remember me Samad? I saw you this morning at Melbourne MMI's.
This is EXACTLY the dilemma I'm facing.
At the moment, I'm leaning ever so slightly towards Melbourne (but that could change at any moment). Only one day left to decide...
Hi Mchli
Yeah, I'm in exactly the same boat as you are. spoken to some of the doctors i met at work experience and they havn't really swayed me in one particular direction, but this is what i've found so far...
-length of degree- the faster u specialise, the better, since extended time can lead to frustration ("when am i going to get out of this?" as said by one doctor), and you can absorb more things as well as push yourself when you are younger (apparently u get only 4 hrs of sleep a night at times in physician training, which is hard when you're old) so that goes to maonash (5 yrs)
-chance to learn more in-depth medical science- melbourne, due to biomed degree+ more academia and research oriented MD
-Research: Melbourne and monash are actually quite similar since Monash is rising in the rankings, although Melbourne has slightly better facilities/ big hospital connections. ultimately however, most of the major research happens after you graduate, to better prepare urself for physician training. don't forget that Melbourne's been around for 150 yrs at the heart of the city and his next
door to facilities such as WEHI, Howard Florey, bio21 etc, whilst Monash has only been around for 50 yrs.
-location: this is really a personal thing, depending on where you live, however the clincal schools at Melbourne are more central as compared to Monash. spending a full clinical year at Frankston or Casey (clinical schools at monash) hospital maybe quite demanding in terms of relocation or traveling time
- Clinical Schools: apparently these don't matter that much according to some of the med students that have posted here. However, talking to doctors in the midst of physician training, the more "reputable" (effectively larger) clinical schools (eg. royalmelb, RCH, women's, Austin at UoM and the Alfred and MMC at Monash) provide higher quality teaching from very experienced doctors, the only drawback being that there is a larger number of med students on placement alongside you which means less time per person with patients. according to these graduated doctors, the teaching at the smaller clinical schools is simply "not very good- don't go there" from what i've heard (this could be biased), otherwise Melbourne gets the tick.
-cohort: received a number of varying opinions here, but Monash definitely supports a more friendly and collaborative environment b/c everyone is training to be a doc together.
- Cash- Monash is tuition paid for full 5 years and $6000/ year bursary (effectively gives you $75 000), whilst Melbourne is only 3 years paid and $5000 for undergrad only. this goes to Monash.
such decisions can never be fully objective so each criterion cannot really be weighted equally. still can't decide...
your thoughts??