There are so many errors in Insight 2010...

[Linkage1992]

For Question 17 of section 1, the answer should be 150 ohm, not 600.

Then for Question 5 of section 2, it should be 1.56 x 10^-6m. They have said the path difference is 4 lambda, when it is 3.

In the detailed study for photonics, they have really screwed up (question 6- , saying the refractive index of the core is lower than that of the cladding. This screws up the values for 7 and 8.

And finally, Question 13 on photonics, I'm pretty sure the answer is D, 10mW, since you should get 10.39mW, and this is the closest answer.

Didn't anyone proofread this exam? lol

[itolduso]

my teacher didn't make up this exam