Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

April 28, 2024, 12:00:41 pm

Poll

How do you think you went?

Probably failed...
Barely passed
That last question...
Not too bad
Pretty good
Great!

Author Topic: Methods Exam Discussion!  (Read 6904 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Commercekid2050

  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 120
Re: Methods Exam Discussion!
« Reply #45 on: November 03, 2021, 02:53:37 pm »
Last question was painful.

I found last question to be kind of tricky. Other than that exam was not that bad.
2021 VCE- English, Math Method, Further Math,Accounting and Economics

2022-2026 Bachelors in Business (Taxation) and Accounting in Monash

Stormbreaker-X

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 699
Re: Methods Exam Discussion!
« Reply #46 on: November 03, 2021, 03:00:39 pm »
Worst fear, a few stupid errors on easy questions
This fear is definitely seen in further math.

Writing Overload

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: Methods Exam Discussion!
« Reply #47 on: November 04, 2021, 02:19:24 pm »
How did everyone find the exam?


Also did anyone get 0 for the very very last question? (Or was it just me?)

Riley Taylor

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Methods Exam Discussion!
« Reply #48 on: November 04, 2021, 03:29:17 pm »
How did everyone find the exam?


Also did anyone get 0 for the very very last question? (Or was it just me?)

I got 0 as well, but not sure about it. It assumes each minima of sin(x/a) is matched by a maxima of cos(ax) and visa versa which I am not sure is possible.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2021, 03:31:27 pm by Riley Taylor »

Riley Taylor

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Methods Exam Discussion!
« Reply #49 on: November 04, 2021, 03:34:17 pm »
I got 0 as well, but not sure about it. It assumes each minima of sin(x/a) is matched by a maxima of cos(ax) and visa versa which I am not sure is possible.


Looking at Desmos, I see at a values close to 0, the maximum minimum value approaches 0 however I believe a was restricted to being only integers, in which case the maximum minimum is -1.

butterflypea

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Methods Exam Discussion!
« Reply #50 on: November 04, 2021, 08:53:04 pm »
what study score should I expect if I estimate about 2-5 marks lost in total across both exams? thx
2021:
Algorithmics: 44 Methods: 50

Orb

  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1649
Re: Methods Exam Discussion!
« Reply #51 on: November 04, 2021, 09:27:08 pm »
what study score should I expect if I estimate about 2-5 marks lost in total across both exams? thx

47-50, but likely 48-49, well done!
45+ raw score guaranteed (or 100% refund) for 2022 Methods & Specialist (other subjects also available - classes for all) register now!

Also hiring excellent Methods, Chemistry, Physics, Biology + Specialist tutors with a passion for excellence - PM me!

We also now support Chemistry, Physics and Biology!

AnonymousCube

  • Fresh Poster
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Class of 2022
Re: Methods Exam Discussion!
« Reply #52 on: November 04, 2021, 10:21:33 pm »
What's would be a cutoff mark/120 for a 45 raw and a 50 raw respectively? IMO, both exams seemed slightly easier than usual, although exam 1 did have a few traps where one could easily lose marks.

P.s I got -sqrt(2) for the last question, when a = 1, can anyone verify/disprove my answer?
« Last Edit: November 04, 2021, 10:48:30 pm by AnonymousCube »
2021: Mathematical Methods [50 + Prems]

2022: Latin, French, English, Specialist Maths, Chemistry

GoodGod

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Methods Exam Discussion!
« Reply #53 on: November 04, 2021, 11:27:42 pm »
What's would be a cutoff mark/120 for a 45 raw and a 50 raw respectively? IMO, both exams seemed slightly easier than usual, although exam 1 did have a few traps where one could easily lose marks.

P.s I got -sqrt(2) for the last question, when a = 1, can anyone verify/disprove my answer?

I am not sure what the cutoff is, but I am convinced that I got 38/40 for exam 1 and 76/80 for exam 2, which is a bit worse than I'd have hoped but oh well, its all done now..
As for that last question, I did not read it properly, so I gave the wrong answer. However I found out that even though many people got -sqrt(2) as the answer, the actual answer is -1 as when a approaches a very high number (in the billions) the minimum value is extremely close to -1.
I'm pretty sure it required limits to work out.