World Order questions are all really similar, I normally approached them in one of two ways. You can go response by response, with a paragraph on the UNSC, a paragraph on the General Assembly, a paragraph on NATO, etc etc - Or you can go case by case, examining contemporary world scenarios and evaluating how all the responses respond to each of them in turn. Both work! I did response by response in my Trial, then case by case in my HSC - Very much your preference
Those are excellent choices, I'd also throw North Korea in there as a super contemporary one - You could also discuss the issues going on with Russia (perhaps including the Ukrainian debacle that happened a few years back)
I personally hate both of those but I'd go with A myself! I'd be discussing how each response encourages compliance with international standards, peer pressure would be a big part of it, state sovereignty would be the barrier to it! This probably will make more sense as you discuss the responses, but you'd include the usuals - UNSC, General Assembly, IGO's etc
Thank you sooo much! I was thinking of setting out my sssay like this (let me know what youuu think!);
Para 1 - UNSC
Para 2 - Courts and Tribunals (ICC and ICJ)
Para 3 - International Humanitarian Law/Treaties... Is this a response? I was going to talk about the Nucelear Proliferaion Treaty, Geneva Conventions?
--> OR should I just pick an entirely different response
For each of them;
--> I'd outline their role in encouraging compliance through the promotion of peace and resolution of conflict including ONE example
--> Outline limitations (mainly state soverignty obvs) with a major case study
Let me know what you think of this
)