I have 3 questions
Firstly, when it comes to the role of the inquisitorial judge, is there one judge that can conduct both the investigation and questioning of witnesses at trial? or are there 2 different judges, an investigating judge that gathers the evidence, and a trial judge who is able to question witnesses?
Secondly, my text book does not offer a very good explanation of a directions hearing. What happens at a directions hearing? Also does a directions hearing clarify issues before going to court if so, how?
Finally, Q9.c on the CPAP 2013 practice examination no.2 says
"Anna and Stephen have worked together for ten years, with Anna purchasing goods from
Stephen to sell in her store. Recently they discovered they have been keeping secrets from
each other.
Anna has been trying to sell the business, even though she owes Stephen a lot of money for
items she bought on credit because he trusts her; while Stephen has been selling Anna faulty
items.
The mess is too big for Stephen and Anna to negotiate together and they have asked for your
help. Advise them on what you think the best avenue and method of resolution would be for
them, giving reasons for your answer."
Do we need the evaluate both the strengths and weaknesses of our chosen method and avenue or is it acceptable to argue just the strengths of our chosen method and avenue and compare them to the weaknesses of the other options?
Thanks