I've written my essay and it's almost 1600 words, but I swear to god I cannot cut anything out of it (limit is 1100). How do you cut stuff out without erasing content? My analysis is fairly long admittedly, but I feel like it's a necessary long if that makes sense. For instance, if I cut out bits from it, not all of the techniques in the quote will be covered if that makes sense. Right now, I swear all of the content is relevant to the thesis so I'm really struggling. All my paragraphs are over 300 words with 2-3 ish quotes in them. Any advice on this? Apologies for all the questions haha
Hey there! You're not the first person to have this issue - don't worry! For me personally, I found the best way to do this was to take a few chunks that seemed to me like they took just a smidge too long to get to the point, and then I'd rewrite that sentence/those sentences. So if I saw there was a three sentence sequence that wasn't completely solid, I'd put it to the side and out of sight, and re-write the essence of those sentences until they fell into a shorter sequence. It's a bit of a tiresome task, but sometimes when you're looking at wording for too long, you just need to put it away, pull it a part, and let it fall back together again. If it doesn't quite make sense,
I've used this cordial analogy before. This is the way I saw it essentially! If you aren't already, remember you can deal with two or three techniques concurrently to show how they compound, rather than doing it all one-per-sentence. Hopefully this gives you a hand!
hey guys
So I need to write a piece of creative writing for after the bomb and I have no idea where to really go with it. We have three stimuluses but if anyone can point me in the right direction in terms of themes to include or motifs that would be applicable to the era, it would much appreciated!
Thank you!!
Hey Maria! Welcome to the forums
Ok, I won't comment too much on the stimulus you've been given yet, and I'll just talk about the basics of an After the Bomb creative writing piece.
So, you need to tackle ways of thinking. Consider them in categories (paradigms, if you wish), and then find the ways of thinking within them. So, we can look at a scientific paradigm, a social, personal, political, or religious paradigm. Let's look closely at religious paradigms, for a second, to find ways of thinking within that. Taking 1960s America, per say, we see a Catholic President, JFK. Christianity, or religion in general, was often looked to as a bastion of safety in a very insecure world. So, we could call it a way of thinking, that people thought if they turned to religion, even if it was all they had, they would be saved. We could delve deeper: did they reallllly think that or was it a superficial cover up? But, you get the picture. Looking at political or economic ways of thinking, we can look into, who thought socialism was the best way of thinking? Who thought democracy was the best way of thinking?
In your response, you need to decide which ways of thinking you want to tap into. You can cover a lot, but you need to delve into a few. Alternatively, you could only delve into a few and make it really worth your while. It's not enough to graze over them, you need to explore. What are the implications of the ways of thinking? How do different ways of thinking interact? If it helps,
here is my own ATB creative. See if you can identify some of the ways of thinking. I tried to tap into suburbia, womens rights, politics, as well as personal.
This hopefully gives you a starting point, but also probably a lot more questions! Soak this up and make a few brainstorms, and then let me know what your next move is and I'm happy to help