Hello!
Does anyone mind giving me brief feedback for my introductions on the following questions. One is for AOS, others are for the 3 modules.
Any feedback is greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance.
Hey there!
AOS:
The value of texts is that they enrich the responder’s understanding of discovery.
Discuss this view with detailed reference to prescribed and related text.
Through
engaging in I'd nominalise this so it becomes "through engagement with" - nominalisation isn't always appropriate, but when it is it boosts the sophistication. creative and intellectual discoveries present
ed in texts, responders enrich their understanding of the ability of such discoveries
I'd probably make this "experiences" to ensure you aren't repeating discoveries twice. But it doesn't jar too much! to transform perspectives about themselves and the world around them. Such is true of the suite of poetry Rosemary Dobson: Collected and Isaac Lidsky’s TEDTalk What Reality Are You Creating For Yourself?, both of which address the dynamic nature of these discoveries as well as the transformative and far-reaching implications to one’s worldview when these discoveries are engaged in.
Love that you're doing a TED talk! They can make for great related texts A:
When drawing comparisons between texts, it is the enduring values that are of the greatest importance.
To what extent is this true of the prescribed texts?
An examination of
the intertextual connections allows for a deepened understanding of enduring values, which are often represented differently due to the dynamic nature of context.
This epitomises the extent of the importance of these values. This sentence kinda doesn't say a lot, I'd leave this idea out for now and tack it onto one of the next two sentences. In particular focus, the representation of integrity and humility in William Shakespeare’s King Richard III and Al Pacino’s Looking For Richard, reveals the contextual influences of religion and secularism on the representation of themes such as the pursuit for power and duplicity, yet despite these influences the importance of the aforementioned values remains enduring.
Too long! I'd take off this end slice and make it it's own sentence (editing needed for it to stand on its own of course).B:
All speeches have a use-by date.
Interesting!Discuss this statement with reference to ‘Spotty-Handed Villainesses’ and one other speech.
The enduring value of a speech lies in its ability to procure the necessity of societal values, such as the importance of education and equality – particularly when these issues transcend the test of time and remain relevant to future audiences.
I personally really love the beginning of this sentence! It offers a lot and sounds very sophisticated. However, I would take out the "such as...." and continue with "particularly" Thus, it is evident that the ‘due date’ of speeches such as Margaret Atwood’s Spotty Handed Villainesses and Doris Lessing’s On Not Winning the Nobel Prize lie in the date of the true achievement of such profound shared values, yet this date is far from reach even today.
C:
To what extent has textual form shaped your understanding of people and landscapes?
A composer’s choice of textual form plays a significant role in
their the polished representation of the experiences of individuals within landscapes, such form significantly heightening audience understanding of the importance of individual attitudes towards the landscape - particularly the natural. Such
I wouldn't use "such" in two consecutive sentences - it's a bit of a stand out word! is true of Melissa Harrison’s urban-pastoral Clay and Andrew Grace’s interactive documentary After the Storm, where their respective mediums are utilised effectively to represent the everlasting relevance of the nature in an urban landscape consumed by technology.
Great work - and great initiative to post all of these. You've done an excellent job, tiny expression things to work on but overall this is great!