faredcarsking123:
Try and keep the text-specific stuff to text-specific threads, especially when there are so many clever ACC people to help out. At this point, try and answer these sorts of questions for yourself though. There's not much point in someone else providing you with set equations of 'time shifts mean ___' and 'narrative voice means ___.' If you work round to these ideas yourself, it will be much easier to implement and demonstrate than something someone else told you was "right."
Selcouth:
There's nothing stopping you, but it's kinda a waste of time. You'll have to write which text is your 'Primary Text Drawn Upon' and so you're not really getting credit for anything else beyond this. The texts are starting points, try to move beyond them.
Sanguinne:
Careful not to conflate freedom with migration; they are not necessarily the same thing.
Other than that, your T.S. sound fine.
millie96:
Again, doing this yourself will be a far more valuable task. It's one thing to want to conduct a mutually beneficial brainstorming, it's another to simply mine others for ideas. Try and hint at some avenues to get yourself started. Rather than saying your piece is "about social construct and morality," think about what you're trying to say through your piece. I could list a hundred things that have something to do with morals and making decisions, but chances are 98 of them would be irrelevant to your message, and the other two are probably ones you've already thought about.
Valyria:
You don't have to, but the metalanguage helps. Talking about the past and present should be sufficient, but if there's an opportunity to use structural vocab, then I'd go for it. But for most texts you wouldn't have to strictly delineated the orientation, complication or resolution.