hello
currently studying 'Ransom' and 'Invictus'.
my q. is Compare the ways in which ‘Ransom’ and ‘Invictus’ highlight the futility of revenge.
just seeking some help how to spit the paragraphs up. i was thinking one of Invictus and another on Ransom. Just wondering what to do for the other one.
Thanks
Any help is much appreciated
i think comparison essays are best to compare continually throughout the essay, over against doing separate paragraphs on each. (depending on the teacher of course, as some prefer it that way)
well i would be inclined to suggest;
para1- the uselessness of revenge, whilst revenge is self-serving it isnt satisfying but instead creates more damage, grief, sorrow, remorse within the revengeful character
para 2- the vicious ongoing downward spiral of revenge, it doesnt enhance lives, but rather one individual's actions can cause grief to entire groups/society's. it is fruitless and pointless. revenge only breaks down relationships rather than enhancing them.
para 3- reconciliation and humanity is a much greater, more honourable, respectful answer or response to grief and sorrow
whilst readers may feel Priam and Mandela could be somewhat justified in seeking revenge they show a more honourable approach. and despite reproach (from hecuba/the princes and Mandela's family and security team) the leaders do what is best for their nation/tribe/groups rather than satisfy personal feelings, which ultimately brings them peace, happiness, respect, legacy
just suggestions.. so dont feel like you have to go with that.!