Hey Guys
Just been wondering, as i love maths and physics, i thought this question can bring out some curiosity.
As i have been researching, i was actually fascinated about the whole concept of a "second".
As i have been told and have studied, the result:
"the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom."
I have a possible rebuttal to this "too accurate" theory.
If this is a second, does that mean that, at the big bang, how the different phases of the explosion measure in seconds, is this deemed to be inaccurate?
- sorry for the defective expression, as all of you know already, physics requires a substantial amount of communication and reasoning, as it can be hard to express, especially in writing.