I have a control freak as a teacher who nit picks everything. This is what her lessons look like; she gives us a booklet then shows us the powerpoint of the booklet to copy out the missing spaces. Then she makes us answer an exam question but first, she writes a 'plan' up, basically giving us the answer. We barely answer questions from the textbook and we barely do case studies. When she asks us a question she answers it herself 5 seconds later and when she gives us an activity she doesnt give us enough time to finish it because she interupts us by giving the answers. On the off chance that someone answers a question she just stares at you and then rephrases what you said but in her way. She expects us to do all of our homework (though she rarely gives us any because again, she gives us all the answers) through google docs and wants the document to be set up in her specific way, she literally told us that we dont need exercise books. How are we meant to learn? She spends more time colour coding then teaching. She's also extremely condescending. She'll read something out and then she'll ask us the most obvious questions like 'do you know what hispanic means?', 'Do you know what detrimental means?' She treates us like we're idiots like we're not in prep, we're in year 12! Ffs she gave us a task words booklet with steps on how to answer questions that begin with discuss, explain, identify, etc.. I'm not stupid! She expects everything to be done her way and wont get it through her thick skull that not everybody likes interactive learning or being fed answers. I feel as if she doesnt allow anyone in the class to think for themselves, everything has to be said and written the way she would do it. I'm also annoyed because i got 8 out of 20 (an E!) for part a of sac 1. I find this very insulting because A, i studied hard and B, subjects like law, politics, history and literature are my forte so how did i f*ck up? When she went through the answers all she did was rephrase what i wrote. One question was explain the right to trial by jury and it was 2 marks but i lost a mark because i didnt say that it only applied to indictable offences like omg she didnt even specify in the question plus why would i need to write that if any idiot knows that only indictable offences are heard by a judge and jury. Another question was explain the principle of fairness and how it is achieved. I explained it and that it is achieved through the hearing rule and the rule against bias, i explained them as well. I lost marks because I didnt spell out for her what bias is. Its not just me whos annoyed, the majority of my class got Es for the sac with some getting a UG. Im considering just reading the textbook and going on edrolo for notes because using her notes are a hopeless cause. My question is, will getting an E for this sac set me up for a bad study score and what will happen if for example, a cohort does better on the exam then expected but their sacs are low, will vcaa question the teachers marking? Thanks in advance.