How would you answer the question
"why has it been necessary for the High Court to interpret the constitution?"
- To keep it current,
- To give the words meaning,
- To arbitrate issues arising,
- To protect the constitution.
I have a question:
I have learned the following sections, what am I missing?
S.51
(i) trade
(ii) taxation
(iii) customs and Excise
made exclusive by S.90(v) postal, telegraphic, telephonic and
other like services(vi) raising naval and military forces
made exclusive by S.114 (xii) currency, coinage and legal tender
made exclusive by S.115(xxi) marriage
(xxvi) legislating regarding people of any race
for the Aboriginal rights referendum(xxix) external affairs
S.71 and 76 high court
S.92 free trade within the cth
S.99 no preference to be given
S.106, S.107, S.108 states' rights
S.109 inconsistency management!
S.116 religion
restrictionS.127 indigenous rights
S.128 method of altering
I know the wording may be wrong for some of them, but yeah, anything missing?