Is entrenched bill of right and entrenched right the same thing ?
A bill of rights is basically a list of rights, while a right is just a right by itself, so that's the difference between them. Either can be entrenched, so a bill of rights is an entrenched list of rights (like the US), while an entrenched right is just like a single right that is entrenched (like the 5 that we have in the Constitution).
With the word entrenched as well, when something is entrenched, it technically means that it's made so it's really hard to amend (like the rights in our Constitution obviously). BUT, in Legal, heaps of teachers use it loosely to also just mean the same as embedded. I haven't come across specific trouble with that, but I remember being confused about it in the beginning, so thought I'd mention it here (one of my Legal notes said that rights can be entrenched into statues, and that the Constitution was an example of this, and a teacher told me that it means yes, rights can be entrenched into other statutes as well, and that was where the confusion about the meaning started. I ended up decided it was too confusing, and I could always get away with never knowing how I'm meant to use it by being vague in my answers, haha).