Things that shit me, and the unconscious/subconscious elitism that needs be discussed: when the media reports on the lives of young deceased people, and feels the need to emphasise their school or job in the headline if they have a prestigious one. Unfortunately, those people (at least most of them) will never be able to live to their potential or achieve what they set out to do, but that doesn't mean that it's ok for the media to judge these things based on the school they went to or the job they have. It's ok for the media to provide details about the person in the story (the school/uni they go to, their job, life achievements/hobbies, family), because this is what all stories about deceased people do, but the headline should only contain their age or the incident, not the prestigious school (which is a irrelevant indicator future potential especially if it's private) or their job. Having these details in the headline implies that these people's lives are more valuable as a result of going to a certain school or having a certain job, and are more worthy of our sympathy.
The only exception I have is if their school or job is linked to their death (story of over-worked, fatigued young investment banker intern in New York or a negligent school).